Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best WWII Tactics Ever: Combat Mission

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best WWII Tactics Ever: Combat Mission

    One of the reasons why I have been posting so rarely these days:

    Anybody interested in WWII or Tactics games should try this one. It´s one of the 3 or 4 best computer games I´ve ever played; in fact it´s the only game I have now been playing for a month or so.

    Unbelievable level of detail; simultaneous movement: both players give orders, then you get to watch a video showing what happens in the next 60 seconds. Great for Pbem. They thought of nearly everything that would have mattered irl. You simply use commonsense and give realistic orders, and will get great results. Unit buying system is very balanced. Every item has some use, and the cost/effectiveness relationships make sense.

    I could go on and on about CM. Pure gaming goodness!

    Edit: Forgot to add link:
    Last edited by Comrade Tribune; June 16, 2002, 21:57.
    Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

    Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

  • #2
    If only it had campaigns and unit improvements I'd agree with you. For tatical battles its brilliant, but I want to be able to folow my troops through an operation or more, not just expend them optimally to achieve a single objective.
    To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
    H.Poincaré

    Comment


    • #3
      Yep. This is a game I keep coming back to..a real classic. You are watching a Sherman go up in flames and wondering why the rest of the platoon is laying smoke and reversing. Then,the answer appears as a Panther comes over the crest...the horror!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Grumbold
        If only it had campaigns and unit improvements I'd agree with you. For tatical battles its brilliant, but I want to be able to folow my troops through an operation or more, not just expend them optimally to achieve a single objective.
        Mmmm, Operations are in. As to Campaigns, this was a design decision: Combat at this level was so bloody that, after 3 battles or so, nobody of the original force would be left, anyway. So they felt Campaigns weren´t realistic.
        Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

        Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by PCRefugee
          ...the horror!
          And the fun of playing pbem, and watching a Company of your opponent´s Elites slowly and steadily advancing toward your Minefields.
          Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

          Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Comrade Tribune
            Mmmm, Operations are in. As to Campaigns, this was a design decision: Combat at this level was so bloody that, after 3 battles or so, nobody of the original force would be left, anyway. So they felt Campaigns weren´t realistic.
            That doesn't make any sense though, because large units are composed of small units. If small units get wiped out, large units are no longer. There is also this thing called replacement.
            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

            Comment


            • #7
              Yeah you can get attached to your tank company even if over time every starting tank or crewman has become a casualty.

              I think I just like my wargames a bit more macro, so I can show that my actions have significantly altered history. Gaining a victory in the Ardennes before being told 'game over - what do you want to play now?' doesn't do it for me. The Talonsoft games appealed becaue you really could follow your soldiers through the war even if you had to command a very large force to impact on the historical events.
              To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
              H.Poincaré

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Urban Ranger That doesn't make any sense though, because large units are composed of small units. If small units get wiped out, large units are no longer. There is also this thing called replacement.
                It does make sense. The small units do get wiped out, and are replaced wholesale. But this replacement part is of no concern to CM, because of scale (squad level units/individual tanks).
                Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

                Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I love that game...play it regularly.
                  You can design your battles to have reinforcements...and the editor will allow you to create a Campaign sized engagement, IMO.
                  When does Barbarrossa come out? Seems like it's late?
                  Life and death is a grave matter;
                  all things pass quickly away.
                  Each of you must be completely alert;
                  never neglectful, never indulgent.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This game has the MtG Seal of Approval.
                    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by SuperSneak
                      When does Barbarrossa come out? Seems like it's late?
                      Maybe in a month or two; they won´t rush it. Perfectionists they are. Nearly everybody who has played CM once or twice loves it.

                      Their operational level WWII game (Airborne Assault) also looks good. I´ll wait a little, though, if there is a boxed version.
                      Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

                      Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        CC, This is a great game. Its alot of fun, the UI isnt half bad either like most games. Not so much great replayability like PG or PanzerCommander. But its still really great during the first few months. I did eventually get bored with it.


                        Im looking forward to future games by them.

                        There are some other cool games you should try if you like those.

                        The whole operational art of war series
                        IL-2 (fps)
                        Panzer General is still the greatest
                        Definetaly check out Steel Panthers I
                        world war 2 online (actually more of a fps game but still a great one)


                        I absolutely love world war 2 online. There is nothing else out there that gets the blood running like this one. To see human controled, dozens of Panzers, 100 germans, and a ****load of towed 88's. Its kind of scary. I do some great aar's for playnet. I should bring one here.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X