Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oh No! Not another Baldur's Gate thread!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elminster's a pure mage, according to the manual, IIRC. Level 20 something IIRC

    Just got to the Candlekeep maze part. Soon will have the last couple of tomes and on to chapter 7
    Smile
    For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
    But he would think of something

    "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Drogue

      As is the PC. A demi-God, sent by the Gods.
      He isn't sent by the gods, he's a god-spawn. He inherited some godly powers, but he certainly isn't given power by any god. The universe of Tolkein and D&D work pretty differently, anyways.

      But since you mention Elminster, he's 'sent by the gods'. (The chosen of Mystra) and is (I assume) rewarded favors by her. Also, aside from being a high level mage, he has some epic class levels aswell. What, I can't tell you, since I don't actually know anything about that stuff.
      Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

      Do It Ourselves

      Comment


      • get this Lord of the Rings crap out of the Baldur's Gate thread

        Comment


        • Elminster's a pure mage, according to the manual, IIRC. Level 20 something IIRC
          They changed this in 3rd Edition sourcebooks to be more like the Elminister in the stories. He gets Clerical abilites from Mystra (untill she gets killed)

          -Jam
          1) The crappy metaspam is an affront to the true manner of the artform. - Dauphin
          That's like trying to overninja a ninja when you aren't a mammal. CAN'T BE DONE. - Kassi on doublecrossing Ljube-ljcvetko
          Check out the ALL NEW Galactic Overlord Website for v2.0 and the Napoleonic Overlord Website or even the Galactic Captians Website Thanks Geocities!
          Taht 'ventisular link be woo to clyck.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by General Ludd

            He isn't sent by the gods, he's a god-spawn. He inherited some godly powers, but he certainly isn't given power by any god. The universe of Tolkein and D&D work pretty differently, anyways.
            Spot on, so no cleric levels.

            Comment


            • He's talking about the PC in BG, not Gandalf/Elminister

              -Jam
              1) The crappy metaspam is an affront to the true manner of the artform. - Dauphin
              That's like trying to overninja a ninja when you aren't a mammal. CAN'T BE DONE. - Kassi on doublecrossing Ljube-ljcvetko
              Check out the ALL NEW Galactic Overlord Website for v2.0 and the Napoleonic Overlord Website or even the Galactic Captians Website Thanks Geocities!
              Taht 'ventisular link be woo to clyck.

              Comment


              • Sorry, clumsy quoting. The last bit was what I wanted.

                Comment


                • Well... are we talking simply about what Gandalf would be in D&D terms, or what he would be if thrown into D&D universe? If it's the latter, well, that's a bit too geeky for me.
                  Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                  Do It Ourselves

                  Comment


                  • You have to pick D&D classes to reflect the LotR characters. Jamski suggested Fighter/Cleric/Mage, which began the futile and entirely pointless argument.

                    Comment


                    • Yes, but reflect them as they where in the story, or reflect them in scenario where they are taken out of their world and put into the D&D universe?

                      The godly powers Gandalf has in Tolkein's writing can only be represented by clerical abilities in D&D rules.
                      Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                      Do It Ourselves

                      Comment


                      • Well I meant the former, but Jamski presumably meant the latter. So we all agree?

                        Comment


                        • Ok, let's agree to agree

                          So... building my six-person party...

                          Gandalf : Fighter-->Mage or Fighter/Mage/Cleric in 2nd ed rules
                          Fighter4/Sorceror x/Cleric x in 3rd ed rules? using staff/longsword
                          Aragon : Ranger or Fighter/Ranger using bow/longsword
                          Gimli : Dwarf fighter - no question - using axes
                          Legolas : Elf Archer Kit in 2nd Ed or Arcane Archer in 3rd Edition using bows.
                          Pippin : Halfling Fighter/Thief using shortswords
                          And I'd really like a proper cleric in the party
                          But another Halfling will have to do

                          -Jam
                          1) The crappy metaspam is an affront to the true manner of the artform. - Dauphin
                          That's like trying to overninja a ninja when you aren't a mammal. CAN'T BE DONE. - Kassi on doublecrossing Ljube-ljcvetko
                          Check out the ALL NEW Galactic Overlord Website for v2.0 and the Napoleonic Overlord Website or even the Galactic Captians Website Thanks Geocities!
                          Taht 'ventisular link be woo to clyck.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Drogue
                            I don't think Gandalf is. He's a high level mage, so is quite good with a staff, but I wouldn't call him a fighter.

                            Also, with the two hobbits, I was thinking of Merrin and Pippin, when Frodo and Sam have gone off, and Boromir is dead. That way it's 6. However Pippin (I think) could well be a fighter thief, in that he fights alongside the shieldmaiden in RotK. However Merrin does seem like complete wuss.

                            Merry (short for Meriadoc) Brandybuck is the one who fights beside Eowyn in Return of the King. Arguably, based on the book (the movies are NOT Tolkien canon) his attack on the witch-king is more or less a backstab - the witch king is facing Eowyn, about to kill her, and Merry strikes him from behind - so that would be compatible with thief skills. He is nonetheless honored as a warrior, since thief has more conventional meaning in Tolkien than in DnD.

                            Pippin (Peregrin) Took apparently fights honorably enough in the ranks of Gondor in the last battle at the gates of Mordor, but with no particular effect. Given his sneaking around to get the palantir, id say hes more thief like than Merry, though Merry does pretty well acting stealthily in the episode in Bree.

                            All in all Id say make Merry fighter/thief and make Pippin pure thief.
                            "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Jamski
                              Ok, let's agree to agree

                              So... building my six-person party...

                              Gandalf : Fighter-->Mage or Fighter/Mage/Cleric in 2nd ed rules
                              Fighter4/Sorceror x/Cleric x in 3rd ed rules? using staff/longsword
                              Aragon : Ranger or Fighter/Ranger using bow/longsword
                              Gimli : Dwarf fighter - no question - using axes
                              Legolas : Elf Archer Kit in 2nd Ed or Arcane Archer in 3rd Edition using bows.
                              Pippin : Halfling Fighter/Thief using shortswords
                              And I'd really like a proper cleric in the party
                              But another Halfling will have to do

                              -Jam
                              Better apporiximation to a proper cleric would be a senior Elf Lord like Glorfindel, or even Elrond. It was apparently Elronds intention to send two such, in place of Merry and Pippin - apparently Elrond was thinking along the same lines as Jamski, and maybe Tolkiens world isnt THAT different from DnD. But Frodos cousins insisted on going along, and Gandalf supported them, insisting loyalty and friendship would be more important than sheer power. Thus it would seem like Tolkien IS quite different from the BG plot, at least.
                              "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Jamski


                                He is clearly sent by the gods of Middle Earth, and is perhaps a minor god himself.

                                To clarify. While in LOTR the Valar seem to be gods, the Silm to some extent reconciles the "paganness" of LOTR with Tolkiens own (Christian) monotheism. The One, the creator of the world and of men and elves, is Iluvatar (Il = El = God in Hebrew, Vatar = Father). The Valar emerged directly out of the thought of Iluvatar, rather than being "created" one of the greatest of the Valar, Menelkor, rebelled and became Morgoth. Thus the Valar seem like the top rank of angels in Judeo-Christian mythology, and the fundamental mythos is that described in Miltons Paradise Lost.

                                Gandalf is a Maia, one of the beings created from Iluvatars thought who were lower than the Valar - thus parallel to the lower ranks of angels.

                                All of the wizards (Istari in Elvish) are Maia - as also are the Balrogs, and also Sauron himself (he started as number 2 to Morgoth) The mother of Luthien Tinuviel was a Maia who married an Elvish king, so there is Maia "blood" in both Elrond and Aragorn. (note parallels to Greek and Germanic mythology, where heroes are of partial divine blood)
                                "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X