Constitutional Crisis in the Unified Sheepstan Republics

[Archaic]

Same to you, since I assume you didn't catch it after I edited the cross-post.

[Sheep]

AQnd I would respect if you were something else in RP then in NS. The UN isn;t evbertything especially when I am not a member. New Griffith they are an dictatroship. Sheepsta aint as poven by its colony Jobedpet.

[Archaic]

The fact that you aren't a member of the UN is irrelevant. As I pointed out before, there are many countries not in the UN that don't get Corrupt Dictatorship ratings.

In any case.......if you accept that Jobedpet isn't a Dictatorship, and you accept that New Griffith is, than you have to accept that Sheepsta is a Dictatorship too, so you can't get out that way. All apparent contradictions on NS simply have to be resolved through some logical RP, but what you've proposed isn't logical.

Maybe Jobedpet is a democracy in a way.....for everyone except the prisoners that you have there in the penal colony, something that you never satisfactorally explained away. (It hasn't been *that* long since the nation was estabished Sheep, not long enough for such a rapid change)

[Sheep]

The first free settlers came three years after the penal colony was established in Australia. I know this for a fact mate. Jobedpet = my little Australia. And Jobedpet was also established as a government in exile place while you had occupied me.

[Archaic]

Bull****. Jobedpet was established as a penal colony by your forces AFTER the Alecrast protectorate government (Again Sheep, it was never an occupation, and all those statements saying such have been IGNORED CANNONED. Stop making that false claim already.) moved out.

[Sheep]

It wasn;t an occupation no. It was an annexation as your thread title suggests. You cannot change your mind and then go off at me for doing the same hey.

[Archaic]

My original statements said it was an annexation. I eventually corrected myself, because I'd used entirely the wrong terminology. You're going to nitpick me for screwing up my grammer a few times when you make posts like you did before?

[Sheep]

It is not screwing up your grammar. it is totally diffrent. Annexation, Occupation, Protectorate, I wonder if you know the diffrences inate in these things. Dude that has to be the worst excuse ever. Now get off my back. I will RP my nation being the democracy it is. You can RP about 'trying to protecte' Sheepsta not annex it like you immediatley envisoned and still probably wish for.

[Archaic]

I already acknowledged that I used the wrong terminology Sheep, and I corrected myself. As I recall, those were my forces, therefore what I say goes as far as their actions. They were protectorates.

Furthermore, regardless of if you say in RP your nation is a democracy, it is blantantly not. NS proves it.

[Sheep]

ahh but your government proclamations prove that you did not iuntend for Sheepsta to be a protectorate

[Archaic]

Bull****. Show me one such government proclamation by myself which said such. Furthermore, even if you could show that, it's beside the point, because regardless of my intentions, they WERE protectorates, and remained so until the end.