Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MP or SP?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MP or SP?

    It's time for a new poll again

    What type of games do you play? SP or MP, modded or original?

    Let's regard Succession games as something in between: if you normally only play SP and you participate in the Succession games, it counts as SP only; if you normally only play MP it counts as MP only; if you play both SP and MP obviously it doesn't matter...
    19
    I don't play CtP2
    0.00%
    0
    I play only Single-Player (original game only)
    5.26%
    1
    I play only Single-Player (modded and/or original)
    57.89%
    11
    I play only Multi-Player (original game only)
    0.00%
    0
    I play only Multi-Player (modded and/or original)
    21.05%
    4
    I play both SP and MP (both original only)
    0.00%
    0
    I play both SP and MP (both modded)
    10.53%
    2
    I play SP modded & MP original only
    5.26%
    1
    I play SP original only & MP modded
    0.00%
    0
    Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

  • #2
    Of course GoodMod in SP, if I play.

    -Martin
    Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm so used to chatting and conducting diplomacy during MP that I honestly find SP a little boring. This isn't just confined to CTP2 because I find the current SP offerings for Civ3 to be blaise as well.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #4
        It seems that games have got more sophisticated over the years since the 80's, but in many ways AI is still very bad at giving a human player good opposition.Even cutting edge AI say for example in the 'Creatures' games does do some very dumb things that even a young player wouldn't, after a bit of experience on a particular game. The only way a computer game can give you a run for your money is by cheating - that in itself isn't a bad thing if it improves your enjoyment.This is in reference to Strat games in particular, that give you time to work out the system that the AI uses. This is where multiplayer comes into it's own.You can't beat playing against another human and it's much more satisfing when you do win.
        'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.

        Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.

        Comment


        • #5
          I ONLY play CTP2 Multiplay - Mod of course, since the original version (unmodded) just does not work for multiplay... At least, I've never been able to finish an orginal CTP2 Multiplay game (and this is over my home LAN).
          ____________________________
          "One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
          "If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
          ____________________________

          Comment


          • #6
            I think most of you will agree that SP may be the reason most players install a game but it is MP that keeps them come back again, and again, and again...
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Oerdin
              I think most of you will agree that SP may be the reason most players install a game but it is MP that keeps them come back again, and again, and again...
              Actually, I've been playing CtP since part 1 first came out and, aside from testing the rush-buy bug, I've never played a single MP game in my life...
              I think for most people it are MP and/or the mods that make them come back again and again...
              Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

              Comment


              • #8
                I`m playing mixed but soloplaying at time only in CIV3, CTP2 only in Multiplayer and when CIV3 will be released with Multiplayer Option and when Moo3 released.....then i have no time more for the good old CTP.
                I like Soloplaying for trying Game tactics and using Modpacks. I like Multiplaying for changing experience with another player and to build up knowledge about myself against another. You will learn perfect playing when you get this experience. AIs plays unrealistic and playing monoton with advantances in hard levels.

                I hope CTP3 will be coming anytime......
                There is any information about CTP3????
                Greetings Mark

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MarkyMark
                  I hope CTP3 will be coming anytime......
                  There is any information about CTP3????
                  Greetings Mark
                  There is info about CTP3 but sadly it is that there will be no CTP3. Curses upon Activision!
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I only play SP modded. Mostly with my own modifications.
                    "Kill a man and you are a murder.
                    Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
                    Kill all and you are a God!"
                    -Jean Rostand

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Pedrunn
                      I only play SP modded. Mostly with my own modifications.
                      Don't you get bored fighting a computer AI that ALWAYS does the same thing in a given set of circumstances? I grant you CTP2 gives players a lot of lee-way in customizing the AI's reactions but it still doesn't intelligently react like a human player would. Nor does it take a look at who's in first place and try to make logical alliances to defeat him.
                      I find the game is much more fluid and unpredictable when you add in the human element that's why I almost exclusively play MP.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Oerdin
                        I find the game is much more fluid and unpredictable when you add in the human element that's why I almost exclusively play MP.
                        Here, here! I completely agree with Oerdin on this one.
                        ____________________________
                        "One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
                        "If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
                        ____________________________

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Oerdin


                          Don't you get bored fighting a computer AI that ALWAYS does the same thing in a given set of circumstances? I grant you CTP2 gives players a lot of lee-way in customizing the AI's reactions but it still doesn't intelligently react like a human player would. Nor does it take a look at who's in first place and try to make logical alliances to defeat him.
                          I find the game is much more fluid and unpredictable when you add in the human element that's why I almost exclusively play MP.
                          Well, I haven't played enough to get bored yet, and once I do, I'll probably burn out and switch to a new time sink of choice. Given that the Cradle AI and the MedMod AI may do different things (and those things evolve thanks to the modders), this could take a while.

                          Now of course you're right that the game would be more fluid and unpredictable with humans involved, and diplomacy is one of the things I enjoy about games like Lords of the Earth...but the Civ family of games are hideous time sinks, and the thought of having to coordinate MY time sink with someone else's time sink is almost inconceivable.

                          And then there's the matter of playing style: I play about as fast as an ungreased glacier. Either the quick players would go mad waiting for me, or I would go mad trying to keep up. (Oh. Too late. I'm already mad...)
                          "...your Caravel has killed a Spanish Man-o-War."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Hermann the Lombard
                            but the Civ family of games are hideous time sinks, and the thought of having to coordinate MY time sink with someone else's time sink is almost inconceivable.
                            Your right that the game does take a while to play but player can do everything but actually move their units on other people's turns... even pre-order all of their units and build ques. That said it is often a pain in the neck trying to coordinate four different players who each live on different contents and who have their own lives outside of the game. In fact I can remember getting up at 2am a few times so that we could balance playing between the three remaining players; one was in Germany, another was in Australia, and I was in California. Talk about a headache
                            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X