New amendement discussion!!!

[mapfi]

hey hey, c) is only a sentence that gives the pres the power to change given ministers' orders if they or their delegates aren't around. It's not about missing orders. That is d) and it keeps the pres from playing on without orders,
but if Wise Ass were to say we build hoplites and archers for the next 30 turns, then Pedrunn could decide where and when he builds them and play 30 turns, but he couldn't decide to build a settler or play 31 turns.
If Turambar were to post a plan how to attack Austria and on its way the stack encountered a single unit, then the Pres could decide to attack that one inbetween,
or if Tur said move east but actually it should be west the Pres can make it right too.
All this provided that the Pres has got a set of orders but has no immeadiate contact with the mister or his delegates.

[Gilgamensch]

Mapfi,

I don't disagree with what you are saying, but I was also trying to defend our President. It wasn't really his fault.........

He should have stopped, mentioned it earlier, but as the rest was still there, they decided to go on.

I think everyone holding an office should take it more 'serious'. As mentioned in the turn-chat threat (TBD), I am missing a lot of information from the 'officers'.

[H Tower]

I'm certainly not saying prosecute Pedrunn, this time. but if he continues his actions in the future, I will file suit. Having someone read Wiseass' orders is very different from having an official delegate IMO

[Gilgamensch]

That's my opinion as well, let it go this time and everybody should take this as a warning

[Gilgamensch]

DL, seem to have problems in the moment

[child of Thor]

I understand a bit better now, sooooo........does Pedrunn(or his delegate) have all the orders from the relevent ministers for tonights playing?