Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Map Setting Finalization: Diversity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Map Setting Finalization: Diversity

    Time to decide on the map settings. See this thread for more introduction crap

    See the Diversity poll, distribution of votes:

    5: 1
    6: 1
    7: 3
    8: 6
    9: 2
    10: 7

    So 75% voted for 8, 9 and 10. 9 seems like a good compromise between 8 and 10, even though only 2 people actually voted for it. If 9 is rejected in this poll, we would have to hold a poll with only 8 and 10 as options.
    13
    Yes
    84.62%
    11
    No
    15.38%
    2
    Abstain
    0.00%
    0
    Last edited by Locutus; November 8, 2002, 10:04.
    Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

  • #2
    Locutus your first link goes into Nirwana............

    Comment


    • #3
      Damn, screwed up the copy-paste. Thanks for the heads-up
      Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

      Comment


      • #4
        You are welcome

        Happen's even to the best

        Comment


        • #5
          nine looks ok
          "Kill a man and you are a murder.
          Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
          Kill all and you are a God!"
          -Jean Rostand

          Comment


          • #6
            High diversity means to give all the players the same change to get a good piece of terrain for the first city, therefore 9 is ok.

            -Martin
            Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"

            Comment


            • #7
              Why exactly do we need to finalize things that have already been agreed upon in another poll?

              Did I miss something when I read through the archives here?
              -->Visit CGN!
              -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

              Comment


              • #8
                if the people wanted ten (or 8) more, then let them have it...

                but i dont care too much lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  DarkCloud,

                  what we were doing, was to take the highest voted options and gave it a run-off poll, making sure that everyone is satiesfied

                  The thing was, that sometimes we had like 2-3 options with the same # of votes (or similar) and therefore another poll was needed to clarify which one to choose.

                  I hope it helps

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DarkCloud
                    Why exactly do we need to finalize things that have already been agreed upon in another poll?

                    Did I miss something when I read through the archives here?
                    why exactly are you bumping a thread that is so old?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      GILGAMESH-

                      Okay, now I understand
                      Instead of "vote for option A" and "vote for option B" you offered "yes for A", which would be a vote for A and "no for A", which would be a vote for B...

                      More confusing, but it works

                      Thank you for the explanation!

                      HTOWER-
                      I just wanted an answer- so I asked in the first thread I saw.
                      -->Visit CGN!
                      -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X