A simple matter of Domination I

[TheBirdMan]

Turn resent to Stas.

[Stas]

sorry
39->

[gumpold]

turn 39->maquiladora

[Maquiladora]

Turn 40 to jkl

quick eh?

[TheBirdMan]

I expected Mieciofok to be back nearly 14 days ago. Anyone who has anything new about him?

I have mailed him and I have forwarded the turn to skulkrakr, hoping he still is interested.

[Stas]

[TheBirdMan]

I'm trying to find a solution - if I play this turn (and the following) the way a moderator should, then I would destroy too much for the Mongol civ.

[gumpold]

Now you know how God felt before the whole Sodom & Gomorah thing.

[TheBirdMan]

Hoping to get FlameFlash to sub here.

[FlameFlash]

And I will... I've got the turn... I'll play it now.

[FlameFlash]

Played and sent... I read the opening parts of the game, but I'm still curious (in case I stick around) are we supposed to go total war or can we go peacenick if we want now?

[checkMate]

Re: A simple matter of Domination I

Welcome to the game Flame!!
Peacenik's are always welcome, but please remember no peace demonstrations allowed.

I looked at the top of this thread too, and I am curious what this means?

Originally posted by M. Darkheart
- incorrect use of slaves, by that I mean creating slaves out of your own slaves (normal use of slaves is no problem)

[FlameFlash]

I have no idea how to do it, so that's all that matters, really.

[TheBirdMan]

Neither do I?!

[Maquiladora]

I think its something about attacking your own city (with a slaver in) after its revolted and you keep doing that, let it revolt then attack with slavers, then revolt it again..... I really forgot how to do it exactly