Little Killers Part I

[Keygen]

Damn, this game is very intence.

I met half players (3) in the first turn (0)

I just met the 4th one and we're still on turn 3.

On second though 6 players in small map is absolute madness!

I like it

Dattler complains for a settler expel.
I have expeled Darth's settlers twise

We barely fit 6 cities in this map with all those cities and around

If it was a classic deathmatch there would be an enourmous and extreme early bloodbath

===
Turn 3 to Nimrod.

[Gavrushka]

Oh yes excellent game indeed.....Nice one Zobo

I'm just waiting for the poor goose that tries to build a wonder....

[Nimrod]

turn to gav

[berXpert]

hey guys... I had not noted this thread was going on, sorry for not posting here but as the previous game die I also think the same about this.

I also didn't know I was figthing Nimrod but Kralj.

I start war with him 'cos he expeled my settler and now I read you all have expeled someone and still in peace

... I didn't knew the rules about not to capture a city or destroy a civ, but I'm happy 'cos even I had entered into 2 Polynesian cities I had not captured them, just destroyed it

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Turn 4 ? Hum ?

[ZoboZeWarrior]

But yes ... BerXpert, I considere that destroying a city is capturing it. As you have to capture it before the city is destroyed ...

Of course you'll have penalties for that, don't worry.

Just if you are agree and for more fun when real hostilities will began no more attacks on cities.
Attacks on units (not in a city!!) are permitted.

I expect of you to be men of Honor, not men of Law.

[Gavrushka]

I think we should hold off assigning target - especially now the Polynesians have lost 2 cities.... they are at a tremendous disadvantage... Turn 19 or 29?? What does our magnificient Moderator Zobo the Zebra think?

[berXpert]

penalties ... why if I didn't know anythink about rules, and as I see nobody had agree that

Well I just will kill other city where I wanted to settle but I was expeled

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Originally posted by ZoboZeWarrior
Of course you'll have penalties for that, don't worry.

Oops, I would said "you will NOT have penalties".



Really ! Sorry ...



(Lapsus révélateur ... )

Of course the rule was not accepted by all players, so you didn't offense it, the case is clear.

[Keygen]

Originally posted by Gavrushka

Zobo the Zebra

Target always count so go kill Nimrod berXpert. If he's my target then I win

Turn 6 to Nimrod.

[Nimrod]

I have 3 cities left, some one kill me now:

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Due to special circonstances :

1) I will decided that target are no more assigned. Target will be assigned in function of geographical location and of power.

2) City destruction are forbidden (by any mean). City Capture is forbidden. Limited war is allowed.

3) Offender of rule #2 will have his turn canceled and nexted (no move for him !).

---

I considere now that everybody have read this thread and are aware of those special rules.
People have to read this thread at least each time they play.

As said one friend of mine : "I'm the Law". So don't piss me off !

---

New proposition :

If two civ are really to weak compare to others civs. Should we make them ally (they would have the same target, and the same predator) ?
---


Judge Zobo.

[Gavrushka]

Zobo - Can U edit a turn and grant two cities to Nimrod ?? All of us were geared for turn 9, and so we were relatively undefended earlier in the game..... But I think that we should indeed look at changing the rules, do something to restore the balance in the game. And I really really think that targets should not be assigned until everyone gets a chance to develop a bit..... ALSO I think it would be good to assign targets NOT on my turn, but tell the weakest civ on their turn who their target is, and then second weakest on subsequent turn - etc - In other words, it is a FULL 6 turns after the weak civ knows his target that the strongest civ knows his? That could help balance too?

[ZoboZeWarrior]

No I don't know how to edit turn. More damage against Nimrod are

There is two other solutions :

1) Maybe I should impose a tax in gold to all player considering their power. But it will be difficult to evaluate it.

2) We could decide more simply to restart the game from the last turn before the first city capture.

But I will be clear : The goal isn't to "punish" the good players !!
But I'm looking for that all players will have fun...

---

And now I prefere that you use diplomaty to protect and reenforce a player too weak. After all the goal of this game are clear.

A last point : BerXpert have make the work of another player easyier ...

[berXpert]

You know what I have other idea... what if I just start kicking other guy... I mean the other one who had been unfriendly with me, so the balance could be granted again

Well I think I'll need Gav aid to kick the other 2 so at the end only we 2 can play

---

if you want we can restart again, my idea was to destroy a civ before turn 9 where Zobo will nominate targets, by that time all will be balanced, more if I didn't keep for myself the cities I take


I start killing Nimrod thinking he was Kralj that said he want not to play.

Sorry Nimrod