Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CTP-Ratings (25-MAR-2001)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    So it goes. When a man gets rating of 21, he's high rated, till he drops, after playing something.

    ------------------
    Solver the "Running Beer" - http://www.aok.20m.com
    Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
    Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
    I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

    Comment


    • #62
      **Original Post Erased**

      Let's leave the system alone! If it is not broke, let's not FIX it!
      [This message has been edited by quinns (edited April 18, 2001).]

      Comment


      • #63
        I'm in - of course (as I will soon get a heavy penalty for my egotrip in the DC )
        First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.

        Gandhi

        Comment


        • #64
          quote:

          Originally posted by berXpert on 04-17-2001 02:41 AM
          Hey jpww,

          I think that in your previous post I was already rated, maybe you are thinking about Eohian who is not rated in that post.



          Actually, If you take a look at the Current Games in Progress list, you'll notice that your name has not been added to #25 (High Voltage)

          -------
          quote:


          Wow!!! Now I'm back to the TOP 6, super cool

          [I know, next rates I'll down, but I'm happy (and surprised) now ]


          Congratulations!

          "I'm an engineer. I make slides that people can't read. Sometimes I eat donuts." - Alice

          Comment


          • #65
            Quinns, I support your proposal but doesn't that mean that their should be a rectification for those that received the old rating? For example I received the full 21 points and so did many others.
            Franses (like Ramses).

            Comment


            • #66
              How about creating a separate list for entry level players?
              "I'm an engineer. I make slides that people can't read. Sometimes I eat donuts." - Alice

              Comment


              • #67
                quote:

                Originally posted by jpww on 04-17-2001 04:39 PM
                Congratulations!





                Thank you twise, I did not note that I was not rated at the first page of this thread.

                [This message has been edited by berXpert (edited April 17, 2001).]

                Comment


                • #68
                  quote:

                  Originally posted by Franses on 04-17-2001 05:36 PM
                  Quinns, I support your proposal but doesn't that mean that their should be a rectification for those that received the old rating? For example I received the full 21 points and so did many others.


                  Quinns, I think Franses has a point here.
                  Either we stay as we are or everybody rated with the initial rank of 21.000 gets 1.000 less.
                  It would be fairer for the newer players but it would be a big decision.
                  I guess we need to discuss it further more .

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I think Frans and Keygen are right. On second thought... we better leave it alone. You are right, it would not be fair. We can get an idea of the WEIGHT of a rating by looking at the win-loss columns. Obviously, if a player has 0 wins and 0 losses their rating WEIGHT is very low and should not be considered very seriously until they get some games under their belt. I'm removing the above post concerning this proposal. Thanks for shedding light on this before I messed up the system!


                    [This message has been edited by quinns (edited April 18, 2001).]

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I have to confess I don't quite like the idea of changine this sytem in this meaning. Actually, those who have followed the ratings system since its vry begginigs have noticed that this was the first thing proposed. But I didn't quite like it. However, I might change my opinion here, still.
                      I don't even consider this being a very serious problem that new Deities have such a high rating, it usually soon drops if they deserve it .
                      I would like to see more opinions on this, however, before I make my decision.
                      And if we make the change, all players who had an initial rating of 21, will have 1 point deducted from their ratings, for otherwise it would be unfair to those new people who will come here later.
                      Waiting for opinions.
                      So, I see the opinions. OK, there will be no change whatsoever.
                      And Quinns, luckily, you can't mess up the whole system up without my agreement, and I wouldn't.
                      ------------------
                      Solver the "Running Beer" - http://www.aok.20m.com
                      [This message has been edited by Solver (edited April 18, 2001).]
                      Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                      Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                      I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I just mailed it to you.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Lung's Fast PBEM - turn 159:

                          1. TheBirdMan
                          2. Stavros
                          3. Lung
                          -. Jon
                          5. Paul

                          Lung and Jon's powergraphs were exactly the same height.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Paul,
                            Take a screenshot of the powergraph and send it to me, with clarification which color are they. I will then look at this and decide, for this time I feel this is required.

                            ------------------
                            Solver the "Running Beer" - http://www.aok.20m.com
                            Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                            Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                            I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              St Jon is higher 1 pixel than Lung.

                              ------------------
                              Solver the "Running Beer" - http://www.aok.20m.com
                              Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                              Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                              I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Quinns,
                                Drop Aaginor from the ratings. He no longer plays CtP, and has agreed to be dropped, as I talked to him on ICQ. One player less , but he won't be in the last place then.

                                ------------------
                                Solver the "Running Beer" - http://www.aok.20m.com
                                Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                                Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                                I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X