Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Discussion on the Constitution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Yes it was a plea for nominations, but what I missed was, that it had been decided to start them on the 15th.
    If it ain't broke, find a bigger hammer.

    Comment


    • #32
      i just thought i'd do that to make it all a lot less confusing. AFAIK the con doesn't specify when elections are supposed to posted

      Comment


      • #33
        Well it specifies them to start once A month doesn't it? It has been nearly two months for this one now.
        If it ain't broke, find a bigger hammer.

        Comment


        • #34
          if we were going to unconfusing-ify the process, there was bound to be a longer or shorter term in sometime. don't worry, it'll all be back to normal next month

          Comment


          • #35
            I don't think it was that confusing before, but the court just didn't start a nomination thread even though I mentioned it multiple times.
            If it ain't broke, find a bigger hammer.

            Comment


            • #36
              Personally I'm enjoying this elongated term

              /me lies back on his Presidential Chair and drinks a cocktail *

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Frozzy
                Personally I'm enjoying this elongated term

                * Frozzy lies back on his Presidential Chair and drinks a cocktail *



                I don't think there are any citizens hankering to run anyway, otherwise I would really pitch a bi**h.
                If it ain't broke, find a bigger hammer.

                Comment

                Working...
                X