How about some civs controlled by human players (non democratic), this will provide more challenging opponents, and more diplomatic options.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Democracy vs. Dictatorship
Collapse
X
-
Hmm, intreguing idea... I think I like it...
But we *would* have to deny these persons access to this forum (which is possible but requires Markos's consent), or they would have access to all our maps, screenshots, decisions, discussions, etc, which would give them a considerable advantage. And we would have to be able to trust these people so they wouldn't just create DLs or bribe people to get around this barrier...
Comment
-
Actually, this DG forum will have to remain public (or else new members can't ever join it), but we would have to DENY people access, rather than the other way around. I think that's possible but can only be done by admins (Markos, Dan, Ming).Last edited by Locutus; January 17, 2003, 15:21.
Comment
-
And I would certainly also want to be one....... Despot I mean.
And make the public forum in the MP-area.
And I think "despots" should try - not be forced to - write a little "tale" at least every 4-6-8 turns to keep the game interesting for other players.First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Gandhi
Comment
-
If we are going to take it that far, why not have 2 or 3 democracy teams and 2 or 3 despots. Spies are nothing new to us today. But Joe Shmo cant just walk up to the prez and say hey where do you keep the nukes around here. Intelligence and counter-intelligence would add an interesting flair to the game.So one guy turns to another guy and says "T.A.I." His friends says "What?" He responds by saing "Think about it;)"
Comment
Comment