Tweet
Okay... I'll vote for Hattie. 
-
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est. -
Or Cathy.
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.Comment
-
Oops, sorry, was at lunch (heh, what idiot set a noon deadline on a work day, anyway
). Will send now...
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Erm, sorry, I don't know why I thought that was so funny.
Seriously, as per my earlier posts, I'd be happy with any other choice which we collectively think would be *safe* in the early game... the necessary flexibility inherent in Civ4 will offer us the ability to shine later.The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.Comment
-
Ok, I'm sending:
Mansa
Saladin
Qin
Elizabeth
Montezuma (even with T's switch, he's still 5th)
Alexander
Asoka
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Monty would be fine... I'm not changing anything
It doesn't matter, though. If we need to get to our 5th choice before getting something, I think we've run into biased mods (highly unlikely). It would mean the top 5 of at least 5 other teams is identical. Otherwise, some other combination should give us at least our #4...
The top 3 is what really matters. We should get one of those, or I'm complaining officially and demand to see the results of the votes (team A votes for civ A, B, C etc).
DeepOComment
-
IT'S OFFICIAL: WE'RE THE MALI
The others are:
Vox: Catherine (Cre/Fin. Hunting/Mining)
Mercs: Frederick (Cre/Phi. Hunting/Mining)
Sanatarium: Elizabeth (Fin/Phi. Fishing/Mining)
Horde: Kublai (Agg/Cre. Hunting/Wheel)
Banana: Louis (Cre/Ind. Agriculture/Wheel)
AC: Qin (Fin/Ind. Agriculture/Mining)
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
No mysticism starters... interesting.Solomwi is very wise. - Imran SiddiquiComment
-
Guess that ends that debate.Comment
-
Case closed[/Ming]
snoopy apparently wants to post each civ's lists. Most of the teams appear to have already ok'd it... one already posted their list themselves.
I see no harm in it. I say we allow it. If, however, people want to object, say so soon, so we can object and prevent it.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Why do we have to disclose our options? I'm against.
DeepOComment
-
We don't have to, and that is kind of the point, I suppose.. .You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.Comment
-
I'm against.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.Comment
-
against.
who friggin cares, let's get this game moving and forget about the trifles.Comment
-
Undecided
What predictability will it have? If I understand veteran-reactions well, AC and Sanatorium will be our most challenging competitors and not in the last place because of their unpredictability. The Horde seems *very* predictable. But then again: appearances deceive.
Brings this question into mind: Do we play "straightforward" or does anybody (already) have ideas on to how to get the other teams thinking we go for other objectives than we actually do? Without deminishing our chances to reach those objectives, of course.Comment
Comment