Originally posted by GeoModder
By its self-declared nature, it sounds to me that the MT can't sign any sort of permanent alliance, because one day for sure there will be a request for troops against their "best client to date".
By its self-declared nature, it sounds to me that the MT can't sign any sort of permanent alliance, because one day for sure there will be a request for troops against their "best client to date".
In case I was being unclear, I'm mentioning permanent alliances as means to ensure that allied victories are "legit".
Clearly it would not make sense to allow permanent alliances without allied victories, but allied victories without permanent alliances would still work. The "Settings" poll only mentions permanent alliances, and so does not really address the larger issue (namely, allied victory).
Comment