Tweet
There seems to be a majority for SP or both, and this should be started ASAP. There are more experienced folks than I in this regard, but I suggest we adopt as a provisional document a decent constitution from a previous game.
-
37Adopt a previous constitution as provisional70.27%26Create a provisional constution16.22%6Write an entire constution13.51%5 -
Um where is the banana option
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta -
please, please, lets not start over with the constitution...Comment
-
What, no banana???? then this can't be an official poll,.....
Wait, there is no con to enforce that as of now, so never mind.....
/me now starts an Anarchist movement...
E_TCome and see me at WePlayCiv
Worship the Comic here!
Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo GameComment
-
I vote adopt-a constituion, however edited wherever it may need it.
If we adopt an old one, we should vote on which one to adopt (unless theres a predominant one, I dont know. Havent been in a demo game in so long).Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.Comment
-
Just adopt an old one and tweak where needed for Civ 4 - one from scratch would have us starting about when Civ 5 comes out
But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
PolyCast | Girl playing Civ + extra added babble! | Yo voté en 2008!Comment
-
The Civ III one would be good.Comment
-
No banana option means no constitution
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Whatever helps us not get bogged down with mumbo-jumbo right from the get go - adopt and quick revise...or anarchy works too.
Comment
-
Can anyone post some links to existing constitutions? I can only find the CtP2 one, but that would need serious tweaking to be applicable to Civ4...Comment
-
here was the original Civ 3 discussion of a Constitution.
I know we abandoned that constitution later, but its a start.
Original Civ 3 ConstitutionResident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.Comment
-
That looks more like a constitution discussion thread than an actual constitution. I don't have time to read the whole thread, which post exactly represents the constitutation that was actually used?Comment
-
#44 looks like it.Originally posted by Locutus
That looks more like a constitution discussion thread than an actual constitution. I don't have time to read the whole thread, which post exactly represents the constitutation that was actually used?
I know there was a cleaner thread with the Constitution and Ammendments, but I am having a devil of a time digging it up.Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.Comment
-
That's not much of a constitution, I can see all kinds of problems arising from it. Not to mention that it's for Civ2, not for Civ3. With a bit of searching I came up with this:
I think this would still need some reworking (at least to determine what responsibilities the ministers will have and to add the amendments to the main article) but it could serve as a fair basis for a Civ4 constitution.
I would suggest using this as basis for further discussion (unless someone can come up with a newer/better version). Since making amendments tends to be a pain in the arse, it would definitely be advisable to take some time to see what needs to be changed before starting the game. I think we'll have people from all kinds of different DG backgrounds (Civ2, Civ3, SMAC, CtP1/2) joining, so let's put that combined experience to good use...
Oh, and the C3DG community not even able to find its own constitution, what a lack of respect for democracy
Comment
-
I blame MarkG. The search function is lacking
I searched my own name and found nothing.
Yay for Ninot's constitutional thread tho.Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.Comment
Comment