Turn 37 - 2520BC

[FeMme]

Originally posted by fed1943
Bad luck, just an wolf or panther could arrive on time.
And perhaps a mistake,too; perhaps warrior should be with
the worker,not the settler.
Now, I think, in Caerbannog keep as is for 1 turn to grow, then
build worker; plan 1 whip to speed it.
Settle 2nd city where settler is. Warrior attacks wolf.
Best regards,

I would rather lose a worker over a settler myself. Although losing any of them could have been avoided if we were more cautious and waited until we popped down the city. We took a chance and lost out, no big deal. We will just have to be super careful next time.

I say we should build the city where we are now.
Thumper should teach the wolf a lesson!!
Dandelion should heal for a bit.
Buttercup should stay put and count blades of grass.
Back at base, the warrior needs a name (Major Marjoram??) and fortify.
Capital Central should grow this turn then switch to worker.

[theViking]

Originally posted by FeMme


We will just have to be super careful next time.

I say we should build the city where we are now.
Thumper should teach the wolf a lesson!!
Dandelion should heal for a bit.
Buttercup should stay put and count blades of grass.
Back at base, the warrior needs a name (Major Marjoram??) and fortify.
Capital Central should grow this turn then switch to worker.

[Lancer]

Perhaps just a tad less happy-go-lucky and a pinch more militaristic. Naming a few new units things like 'Darth' or 'Bart' instead of the usual 'Fluffy' would go a long way.

At my level of operational contribution giving advise is something I haven't really earned, but there you go.

[GeoModder]

Okay, our first horse unit will be called 'Lancer'. Happy now?

I propose 'Warhammer' for our second warrior.

[GeoModder]

Snoopy put civstats back online. We had 5 hours left before turnover and since its nighttime at Rob's part of the world I played the turn.

[PLATO]

Hey, I like the "fluffy" names. Can you imagine our enemies embarrasment when their unit "Bonecrusher" is taken out by something named "Fluffy"?

[Lancer]

Well thanks on the 'Lancer' unit Geo.

I suggest 'Fluffy' names for workers that can't defend themselves. (Which I never agreed with btw, and niether did the workers at the Stalingrad tractor factory iirc...)

Units getting beat by Fluffys sounds cool PLATO, but in fact it wouldn't work irl. I was in the 2d Armored Cav on border patrol duty and the Sovs never invaded Germany. Had I been in the 2d Fluffy Pansies they would have hit us hard for sure.

You see my point.

So we lost a worker, we'll survive it and be more ready for the harsh realities of the world we play in. Lets move on...and think security...

The military must be there for the people....err Rabbits!