Disputes Thread

[Krill]

Never?

[Hercules]

oh ... ok ... when are we getting the official game history?

I know I am not one to talk but when are we getting the official history.?

[Zoid]

What do you want to know that's not in this thread and The Hanging Gardens one? Or in Sullas excellent write up? And Krill doesn't seem that keen to write it either...

[Krill]

Well, here is the history that the Templars deserve: You guys played like ****, were overly paranoid, and don't have a clue about civ. Not knowing that you only need IW and not iron to chop jungle? Attacking a guerilla longbow on a hill with a catapult? Cottaging the only tile that would let you irrigate a rice? Never expanding past 5 cities? And thinking that a double holy city capital is useful, when you never even get a Prophet?

Are you guys on glue or something?

[Hercules]

I just asked.

But ok if that's a summary of your attitude, forget it.

[darrelljs]

Im trying to figure out if Krill is trying to prove his point about trolling or if he is just plain mean .

Darrell

[Indiansmoke]

Well, here is the history that the Templars deserve: You guys played like ****, were overly paranoid, and don't have a clue about civ. Not knowing that you only need IW and not iron to chop jungle? Attacking a guerilla longbow on a hill with a catapult? Cottaging the only tile that would let you irrigate a rice? Never expanding past 5 cities? And thinking that a double holy city capital is useful, when you never even get a Prophet?

Are you guys on glue or something?

Haha...

Krill I love open harted critisism like that, instead of people just trying to be polite and politically correct!

1/5 done lets hear the rest 4/5.

[darrelljs]

I love open harted critisism like that, instead of people just trying to be polite

Believe it or not, some people don't have to try to be polite...it just comes naturally .

Darrell

[Zoid]

Haha...

Krill I love open harted critisism like that, instead of people just trying to be polite and politically correct!

Don't you mean "open hatred"?

[Krill]

I just asked.

But ok if that's a summary of your attitude, forget it.

Ironically you'll realise that is everyone elses' opinion of how you played. They might not voice it, but that's the general opinion.

Pity you haven't done anything to explain your actions yourselves.

[Zoid]

I must say that as game historian you should keep an objective view on events. And you chose to not participate in this game because you didn't like some of the settings, thus you've been sitting on the side line all this time. Not really the best position when it comes to criticism IMO. You haven't really contributed anything to this game except for girly whining and acerbic one-liners... Your attitude reminds me of a child that doesn't want to build sand castles with he other children because he doesn't get to do it exactly the way he wants to, and after they're done he goes around and criticizes some of the kids because they're obviously idiots that builds crap sand castles and shouldn't be allowed within 10 feet of sand and water...

[Krill]

That would be good criticism, apart from the fact that I'm currently helping lead a demogame team over on CFC, which most definately isn't using rules I'd choose, or a map that I'd design.

As it is my criticisms are valid for one reason: I know the balance of the game. Every single criticism listed above is objective, if stated in no uncertain terms. Please disprove them.

[Zoid]

Good for you, congratulations on growing up

My point is that you are being an ass. Ironically you'll realise that is everyone elses' opinion of you as well. They might not voice it, but that's the general opinion...

[Krill]

Cool. I'm the civ version of House.

[Indiansmoke]

Don't you mean "open hatred"?

That is not hatred Zoid, the guy just said the truth with the first words that came on his mind. Could have put some sugar and cream, but at the end the base would be the same...sugar and cream are always nice though