Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Could we standardize that version number?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Could we standardize that version number?

    Harel, and others, could we agree that the new, after thel List V2.0 threads will be titled V3.0?

    Thank you.
    "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
    "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

  • #2
    Thanks for the input Stefu.
    The answer is: nope, we can't.

    Never agreed with the transformation to 2.0 anyway. Why should we move to 2.0 just because we have a new list? or to 3.0 for that matter. What matters is how many changes we made to the summary: what goes to the list is just a copy of what we normaly do. Not like we make summaries speciality for the list: it's just the summaries we should have made eons ago.

    I am keeping the +0.1 system, and have no intention to change that!
    "The most hopelessly stupid man is he who is not aware he is wise" Preem Palver, First speaker, "Second Foundation", Isaac Asimov

    Comment

    Working...
    X