Now you're busy about a complete tech model, some thoughts...
I had created 2 scenarios back in the Civ2 age(never put on the Internet. They never got completed cause I had some problems with the rules.txt and the FW scenario editor.).
But I did create 2 brand new tech trees for them on paper, each contaning +- 70 techs, so they could be used for Civ3.
However before we can do this, we must now three things from Firaxis (and considering how little information they gave in the past, this is very unlikely) :
1) Starting age of Civ3 (that Jeff interview from a while back suggested that Civ3 might start earlier than 4000 BC)
2) Ending age (future or not)
3) Are they gonna keep almost the same tech tree or take the challenge of creating a super eg300 techs tree?
And those scenarios went about the Ancient Age (my superbetter version of that bad Rise of Rome scenario) and the Renaissance (my supersuperbetter version of that bad Age of Discovery scenario).
That are the era's where I am most interested in and know most of, so my technological knowledge of the early Middle Ages and the Modern Age is limited. BTW there wasn't much discovered anyway in the Middle Ages, mostly weapon tech; and about that I know nothing besides some general things like crossbow etc.
So wouldn't Diodorus be the best man to do it?
And yes, I think also it would cause a lot of posts (SE and Religion are the biggest threads. Coincidence?), but mostly negative ones, looking back at SE. So I don't think making a tech model is desirable for me and my already bad reputation if I get really fanatic about it.
Oh, Yin, that List has to come very soon. Soon we'll get even less posts/day than the Firaxis forums!
And will there be a SE summary? I guess not.
I had created 2 scenarios back in the Civ2 age(never put on the Internet. They never got completed cause I had some problems with the rules.txt and the FW scenario editor.).
But I did create 2 brand new tech trees for them on paper, each contaning +- 70 techs, so they could be used for Civ3.
However before we can do this, we must now three things from Firaxis (and considering how little information they gave in the past, this is very unlikely) :
1) Starting age of Civ3 (that Jeff interview from a while back suggested that Civ3 might start earlier than 4000 BC)
2) Ending age (future or not)
3) Are they gonna keep almost the same tech tree or take the challenge of creating a super eg300 techs tree?
And those scenarios went about the Ancient Age (my superbetter version of that bad Rise of Rome scenario) and the Renaissance (my supersuperbetter version of that bad Age of Discovery scenario).
That are the era's where I am most interested in and know most of, so my technological knowledge of the early Middle Ages and the Modern Age is limited. BTW there wasn't much discovered anyway in the Middle Ages, mostly weapon tech; and about that I know nothing besides some general things like crossbow etc.
So wouldn't Diodorus be the best man to do it?
And yes, I think also it would cause a lot of posts (SE and Religion are the biggest threads. Coincidence?), but mostly negative ones, looking back at SE. So I don't think making a tech model is desirable for me and my already bad reputation if I get really fanatic about it.
Oh, Yin, that List has to come very soon. Soon we'll get even less posts/day than the Firaxis forums!
And will there be a SE summary? I guess not.
Comment