OK, so I have been a wimp all this time. I stuck with playing on Regent because I could learn and refine my strategies. Over time, I have come to favor the French as my civ of choice - only partly because of the sound the the Musketeer makes!
I decided to be a stud and step up to Monarch. First game went OK but since then, I just cannot keep up with tech development, etc. I am thinking about giving up my investment in tech and trying to make enough cash to buy techs. My question is about whether this strategy will work, and how to make it work. Can it work in mid game?
One of my problems is that neighboring civs are much more aggresive on Monarch. In my current game I started out next to the Zulus. I used my standard early game strategy of building horsemen to cripple them when they picked a fight (it is easy to get Zulus to declare war). Later, I was about to finish off the Zulus when the Egyptians, of all civs, up and declared war on me. In between, I had to fight off the Japanese (there is a race that I HATE to have on a continent with me). So I fought off the Egyptians and then had to surrender a tech to keep the Japanese from attacking me.
I just cannot seem to get that edge up. BTW, it still pisses me off (can I say that?) that 3 or 4 AI civs will swap every new tech advance but will not accept ANY offer from me. Tech whoring is still not right.
Anyway, I've read lots of strat posts, I have played this game from the first week it was out (no, really I have). I could just use some help with getting over the hump to competing on Monarch. I cannot imagine going back to Regent but I would like to win 50% of my games here.
One last thing. I have not posted in a long time because I have that work thing that gets in the way - I play CivIII on my laptop when I travel. However, it seems to me that the quality of the posts has really improved from a few months ago. The unreasoning whining is almost non existent (Yeah!!!) and the posts are, by in large, pleasant and instructive to read.
Carlos
I decided to be a stud and step up to Monarch. First game went OK but since then, I just cannot keep up with tech development, etc. I am thinking about giving up my investment in tech and trying to make enough cash to buy techs. My question is about whether this strategy will work, and how to make it work. Can it work in mid game?
One of my problems is that neighboring civs are much more aggresive on Monarch. In my current game I started out next to the Zulus. I used my standard early game strategy of building horsemen to cripple them when they picked a fight (it is easy to get Zulus to declare war). Later, I was about to finish off the Zulus when the Egyptians, of all civs, up and declared war on me. In between, I had to fight off the Japanese (there is a race that I HATE to have on a continent with me). So I fought off the Egyptians and then had to surrender a tech to keep the Japanese from attacking me.
I just cannot seem to get that edge up. BTW, it still pisses me off (can I say that?) that 3 or 4 AI civs will swap every new tech advance but will not accept ANY offer from me. Tech whoring is still not right.
Anyway, I've read lots of strat posts, I have played this game from the first week it was out (no, really I have). I could just use some help with getting over the hump to competing on Monarch. I cannot imagine going back to Regent but I would like to win 50% of my games here.
One last thing. I have not posted in a long time because I have that work thing that gets in the way - I play CivIII on my laptop when I travel. However, it seems to me that the quality of the posts has really improved from a few months ago. The unreasoning whining is almost non existent (Yeah!!!) and the posts are, by in large, pleasant and instructive to read.
Carlos
Comment