Good points about the Catapults. They can serve the same function as Horse in softening up the enemy. However, they do not have the ability of *going mobile* and wrecking havoc on the enemy rear area. Nor can they defend something by themselves in a pinch. OTOH they do not die when a bombardment fails, Horse sometimes do.
If I'm feeling rich in production capability I would go with Legions and Horse. If I'm in a pinch, Legions and Catapults with very few Horse. Or, pure Horse. The map will have a very big influence on your choice of war machine.
BTW, going pure Horse as the Romans allows a subtle strat. The Golden Age of your choice. So your Horse have conquered the enemy civ for the most part and you have settled all your new lands. Finish the enemy off with a few Legions and voila, you enter a Golden Age that propels the production of your cities to build a bunch of improvements fast. This is also a matter of choice, and the particular game circumstances will effect what the *best* decision would be.
Salve
If I'm feeling rich in production capability I would go with Legions and Horse. If I'm in a pinch, Legions and Catapults with very few Horse. Or, pure Horse. The map will have a very big influence on your choice of war machine.
BTW, going pure Horse as the Romans allows a subtle strat. The Golden Age of your choice. So your Horse have conquered the enemy civ for the most part and you have settled all your new lands. Finish the enemy off with a few Legions and voila, you enter a Golden Age that propels the production of your cities to build a bunch of improvements fast. This is also a matter of choice, and the particular game circumstances will effect what the *best* decision would be.
Salve
Comment