Why AI builds Infantry/Riflemen/Mech. Inf. so often and Tanks/Cvalry so rarely?
Some hypothesys:
1) In my test game AI used Mech. Inf. instead of Tanks (and Infantry insead of Cavalry), but it USED Cavalry insted of Riflemen (MODed to 5/6/1 cost 70). Maybe it used Cavalry since it is more expensive then Riflemen: 80 vs 70 (expensive == must be good unit). Mech. Inf is more expensive then Tanks (110 vs 100)
2) Maybe it's something totaly diffenert. Maybe AI looks how many offense untis are active. If it has too manu, it doesn't build more. And since it will always have more then enough offense units since Infatry is both defenese and offnese (and AI will usually need defense units), it won't build real offense units (cavalry & tanks).
3) Maybe evaluation includes some formula which includes both movment, attack & defense values of units. (But what formula?)
4) Maybe Offense + Defense flag is only good for units which are nomaly ofen used for offense (like Legion, Bowmen and Samurai), and not for priamry defenders (like Riflemen, Infantry and Mech. Inf.)
Soren?
Some hypothesys:
1) In my test game AI used Mech. Inf. instead of Tanks (and Infantry insead of Cavalry), but it USED Cavalry insted of Riflemen (MODed to 5/6/1 cost 70). Maybe it used Cavalry since it is more expensive then Riflemen: 80 vs 70 (expensive == must be good unit). Mech. Inf is more expensive then Tanks (110 vs 100)
2) Maybe it's something totaly diffenert. Maybe AI looks how many offense untis are active. If it has too manu, it doesn't build more. And since it will always have more then enough offense units since Infatry is both defenese and offnese (and AI will usually need defense units), it won't build real offense units (cavalry & tanks).
3) Maybe evaluation includes some formula which includes both movment, attack & defense values of units. (But what formula?)
4) Maybe Offense + Defense flag is only good for units which are nomaly ofen used for offense (like Legion, Bowmen and Samurai), and not for priamry defenders (like Riflemen, Infantry and Mech. Inf.)
Soren?
Comment