Hi,
I have previous experience from Civ1, Civ2, and Alpha Centuri.
I never really played those games a lot, but I played enough to understand the game.
However, in my first game of Civ3, I got completely wiped out.
My strategy was to build a few cities (had about 15-20) when the game timelimit ran out in 2050AD. However, each of those cities were completely developed in that they all had every improvement they could have.
My military was weak, but I never wanted to make a strong military. ( I wanted to see how these new "winning" modes worked.
In the past Civ games, I always did well having a few cities.
It seems to me in Civ3 you NEED to jsut built massive amounts of cities.
The problem is that timelimit.
When the game ended, I had just researched Steam power. I basically missed out on 2 entire revolutions. (Industrial and modern)
What did I do wrong? Suggestions?
My science investment was a stead 60-70% throughout the entire game.
I'm really suprised here.
Thanks for any help.
Smithy
I have previous experience from Civ1, Civ2, and Alpha Centuri.
I never really played those games a lot, but I played enough to understand the game.
However, in my first game of Civ3, I got completely wiped out.
My strategy was to build a few cities (had about 15-20) when the game timelimit ran out in 2050AD. However, each of those cities were completely developed in that they all had every improvement they could have.
My military was weak, but I never wanted to make a strong military. ( I wanted to see how these new "winning" modes worked.
In the past Civ games, I always did well having a few cities.
It seems to me in Civ3 you NEED to jsut built massive amounts of cities.
The problem is that timelimit.
When the game ended, I had just researched Steam power. I basically missed out on 2 entire revolutions. (Industrial and modern)
What did I do wrong? Suggestions?
My science investment was a stead 60-70% throughout the entire game.
I'm really suprised here.
Thanks for any help.
Smithy
Comment