So, one steamthunk has posted this in my story thread:
I really think it's a great idea. We've seen plenty of stories that an author has started and never finished because he got bored. And yet, the original idea might have been great. It's always sad to see stories die unfinished like that. Especially good ones. Besides, I know that sometimes the authors run out of ideas, and suggestions from the readers are great.
Now, if we have several writers, most of those problems will be solved!
With minor modifications, the idea would be kind of like a NES:
Of course, it will not be a NES in that:[list=1][*]It will actually have an end![*]Even though it will not be based on an actual game (it might be based on an imaginary game, though), the co-authors don't have to assume the roles of the rulers of certain nations.[*]It will be more of fiction, kind of like most of the stories here nowadays, rather than pure 'politics'.[/list=1]
That's the idea. Now, for the implementation. Here is what I think would work:
For each story, the author of the original idea posts two threads. In thread one, he describes the general idea of the story (not necessarily giving out the plot), and some of the characters. Then, a team is formed. (Either by PM'ing the author, or by posting in that very thread.) Although that is not necessary. Consequently, the author posts an introduction to the story. From then on, all of the team members are free to contribute ideas or even chunks of text to the story. After each chapter posted in the thread by each of the co-authors (or rather: by whomever of them would like to contribute), the people (both readers and writers) decide which one was the best.
Once it is chosen, the second thread comes in. There, only the chosen chapters will be posted (in order to avoid clutter, which will be inevitable in the 'draft' thread).
Of course, if at some point the original author decides he is tired of the story and drops out, it doesn't really matter any more, because all of the co-writers are on equal terms when it comes to creating that story.
What do you folks think? Is this idea worth going ahead with? Steamthunk, since this is your original idea, would you like to maybe add something to what I posted? Or maybe do something differently?
Post you feedback, guys and gals.
Originally posted by steamthunk:
<...> maybe we should start a thread where someone comes up with a premise and some characters and we choose characters to write about. This would solve everyone's <...> fascination with wanting to alter stories!
<...> maybe we should start a thread where someone comes up with a premise and some characters and we choose characters to write about. This would solve everyone's <...> fascination with wanting to alter stories!
Now, if we have several writers, most of those problems will be solved!
With minor modifications, the idea would be kind of like a NES:
- One person comes up with a premise.
- That same person might come up with characters.
- Then, several writers join the 'team', and altogether the people get writing.
Of course, it will not be a NES in that:[list=1][*]It will actually have an end![*]Even though it will not be based on an actual game (it might be based on an imaginary game, though), the co-authors don't have to assume the roles of the rulers of certain nations.[*]It will be more of fiction, kind of like most of the stories here nowadays, rather than pure 'politics'.[/list=1]
That's the idea. Now, for the implementation. Here is what I think would work:
For each story, the author of the original idea posts two threads. In thread one, he describes the general idea of the story (not necessarily giving out the plot), and some of the characters. Then, a team is formed. (Either by PM'ing the author, or by posting in that very thread.) Although that is not necessary. Consequently, the author posts an introduction to the story. From then on, all of the team members are free to contribute ideas or even chunks of text to the story. After each chapter posted in the thread by each of the co-authors (or rather: by whomever of them would like to contribute), the people (both readers and writers) decide which one was the best.
Once it is chosen, the second thread comes in. There, only the chosen chapters will be posted (in order to avoid clutter, which will be inevitable in the 'draft' thread).
Of course, if at some point the original author decides he is tired of the story and drops out, it doesn't really matter any more, because all of the co-writers are on equal terms when it comes to creating that story.
What do you folks think? Is this idea worth going ahead with? Steamthunk, since this is your original idea, would you like to maybe add something to what I posted? Or maybe do something differently?
Post you feedback, guys and gals.
Comment