Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Revised Political Concept.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    It would be better that this game should not be named Citystates game to avoud confusion.

    Let s name thi one something with politics, the Citystates Game is here.

    Aidun
    "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring.
    Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DG and proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDG

    Comment


    • #32
      Maybe just call it Colonies. Basically, you are setting up colonies throughout the world.

      With only one city in range of your palace and spread out islands and AI landmasses, corruption will be a problem. You may want to reduce or eliminate corruption. Also, you may want to make it so the palace can not be moved (or maybe just an agreement with all teams not to move it).

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Aidun
        Let s name thi one something with politics, the Citystates Game is here.
        Just to set the record straight, that one is a spin-off of this one which was the original proposal.

        Comment


        • #34
          Ok then, how about "Open Citystates"
          ____________________________
          "One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
          "If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
          ____________________________

          Comment


          • #35
            Yes, this is how I understood it to be. I viewed this as something mirroring the Ancient Greek Citystates of Sparta and Athens. In this case the Greeks were all aware of the other citystates and worked together against common enemies but also fought each other for dominance and control. I may be way off, but I had assumed this is where the "Citystates" title came from.

            Comment


            • #36
              Yes Thrumble exactly like my first proposal in which I laid the comparison with the Pelopponesian war.

              GF, I believe the games are separate of each other. You came up with a c game with political factions first. Instead of it I proposed an idea with citystates, as I called the little states in my proposal. My idea is as original as yours.

              To be clear to anyone here. The Citystates Game is not a spin-off from Ghengis's game, but my idea, and I have no idea what the concept of early december is. The only thing I know is that I proposed an idea that interested me and of which I hoped that it would interest others too.

              Here is the original post of the 15th of March

              Originally posted by Aidun
              What would people think of a "Citystates" game. Some objective person would have to create a random map in the editor, put some cities and a large amount of civs on it and make sure it is designed for more than one player.
              Each team plays a citystate: a very small state of a maximum of 3 cities. This compared to the large empires that the AI civs will build. Only through a perfect cooperation the Apolytonian citystates can survive. However, citystates are free to decide to cooperate with othet citystates ar be in war with them.
              It is also possible to play without AI. We can simulate the peloponnesian war for instance.

              Please post some comments on this concept.

              Aidun
              Last edited by Aidun; April 2, 2003, 10:52.
              "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring.
              Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DG and proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDG

              Comment


              • #37
                HeHeHe, my quote:

                Originally posted by GhengisFarb on November 17, 2002
                Another really out of the blue idea I had.

                What if we played a PTW Democracy game where there were 2 AI civs (say at Diety level) and all the rest were human civs.

                Each player gets one city, that is the players city and the player sets its build queu and whatever. The first city for each civ is the capital of that civ and is under the control of the elected leader of that civ.

                Sound normal? Here's the twist. Any player can switch civs at anytime if the new civ will have him. All military units, treasury, techs, are civ property and stay with the civs. There would be a "safe civ" where you stay between switching from one of the other 5 civs to another, but you can only stay in that "safe civ" for a specified period before you have to join the new civ that accepted you.

                It would be a sorta Citystate Democracy game.

                There's a lotta rules and guidelines that still need to be hashed out, but I thought I'd see if anyone finds it interesting.

                I'm not 100% sure that your city improvements go with a city when you give it to another civ though, can someone enlighten me on that?
                We later changed and altered the format quite a bit as we wanted to make something workable but I think I beat your post by a little bit..........

                Not that it makes any difference, I was just kinda suprised to go to the Demo game forum and discover someone had started a signup thread using the name we were using for this game and it was a completely different concept.
                Last edited by GhengisFarbâ„¢; April 2, 2003, 11:40.

                Comment


                • #38
                  all I know is that now I am just MORE confused...

                  and now I feel like the guy in line for some free stuff who really doesn't know why he is in line for...
                  A true ally stabs you in the front.

                  Secretary General of the U.N. & IV Emperor of the Glory of War PTWDG | VIII Consul of Apolyton PTW ISDG | GoWman in Stormia CIVDG | Lurker Troll Extraordinaire C3C ISDG Final | V Gran Huevote Team Latin Lover | Webmaster Master Zen Online | CivELO (3°)

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by GhengisFarb on November 17, 2002
                    Another really out of the blue idea I had.

                    What if we played a PTW Democracy game where there were 2 AI civs (say at Diety level) and all the rest were human civs.

                    Each player gets one city, that is the players city and the player sets its build queu and whatever. The first city for each civ is the capital of that civ and is under the control of the elected leader of that civ.

                    Sound normal? Here's the twist. Any player can switch civs at anytime if the new civ will have him. All military units, treasury, techs, are civ property and stay with the civs. There would be a "safe civ" where you stay between switching from one of the other 5 civs to another, but you can only stay in that "safe civ" for a specified period before you have to join the new civ that accepted you.

                    It would be a sorta Citystate Democracy game.

                    There's a lotta rules and guidelines that still need to be hashed out, but I thought I'd see if anyone finds it interesting.

                    I'm not 100% sure that your city improvements go with a city when you give it to another civ though, can someone enlighten me on that?
                    Ghengis what are we disputing about? If I had known this before, we wouldn't have needed to dispute.
                    You presented your concept before I even joined Apolyton. Summarized, I re-invented your idea without knowing of it.

                    Let's go on: now that the dust is removed, I think we can better discuss if it is possible to let the 2 games join into one.

                    Aidun
                    "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring.
                    Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DG and proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDG

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Master Zen
                      all I know is that now I am just MORE confused...

                      and now I feel like the guy in line for some free stuff who really doesn't know why he is in line for...
                      Free bread!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Throw in a doughnut or two.
                        Join a Democracy Game today!
                        | APO: Civ4 - Civ4 Multi-Team - Civ4 Warlords Multi-Team - SMAC | CFC: Civ4 DG2 - Civ4 Multi-Team - Civ3 Multi-Team 2 | Civ3 ISDG - Civ4 ISDG |

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X