Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Diplomatic Victory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Diplomatic Victory

    Is Diplomatic victory even a possibility in PTW MP? Why would you give up your vote to let someone win when you can try to win the game to the death? The goal of the game is to achieve victory isn't it? Unless you can't bear to see the currently leading player win I guess.....
    :-p

  • #2
    Well, if a team is cunning enough to get diplomatic victory, we should let it do so It a teams gets diplpomatic victory, it will become legendary
    "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
    "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
    "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

    Comment


    • #3
      Votes could be a huge bargaining tool
      Proud Member of the ISDG Apolyton Team; Member #2 in the Apolyton Yact Club.
      King of Trafalgar and Lord of all Isolationia in the Civ III PTW Glory of War team.
      ---------
      May God Bless.

      Comment


      • #4
        You may be right Panzer.. but I would never sell something like that which has huge risk of losing...
        Unless you engineer the vote to come out as a... tie..... hmmm excellent
        :-p

        Comment


        • #5
          If a team is already in a position where it has no real chance of winning itself, it has no major reason not to vote for another civ that's been freindly with it in the U.N. election. And if all that's needed is a majority of the votes not counting abstentions (something I'm not sure about), in a two way race, all it would take is one of the other civs choosing to vote for someone instead of abstaining to have a winner.

          From there, things really get complicated because a team that's not in the running for the election might guess that another team not in the running will vote for someone and try to vote to counteract that vote (in the hope of deadlocking an election that otherwise would have a winner), or might just figure that if there's likely to be a winner, they may as well have their say in who wins. So the possability of one civ's not abstaining could influence others not to abstain.

          So if I were in hot pursuit of some other kind of victory, I would be very nervous about letting anyone else build the U.N. if I could help it. And if I were a builder civ that was on good terms with most of the others, I'd do my best to get it.

          Nathan

          Comment


          • #6
            The winner needs the absolute majority of votes to win a diplomatic election. If there are too many abstentions, then there is no winner
            "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
            "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
            "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

            Comment


            • #7
              You also have to play mind game that player X has secured majority of vote so "we must protect ourselves by deadlocking"... hehehee
              :-p

              Comment

              Working...
              X