So some reviewers can be bought out and some can't

[Huzurdaddi]

Interesting.

Tom Chick over at gamespot who has been reviewing games for a long time gives a full thumbs down on Civ PtW. Guess that now that gamespot has gone as a pay site I guess they need not take bribe money. You can see the full review here:

http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/reviews/0,10867,2897110,00.html

OTOH you have a new commer to the reviewing biz Robert Mertes who works for gamesdomain which is struggling to make ends meet. He gives PtW a big thumbs up, heck he does not even talk about multiplayer. Amazing. I wonder how much they had to pay him for that review.

http://www.gamesdomain.com/gdreview/zones/reviews/pc/nov02/civ3ptw.html

I eagerly await for the mods to delete this post. Since it's not 100% flattering to fraxis. BTW, guys where is the patch? I mean it has been over a week now. Some of these bugs, seriously, seem pretty easy to fix. Not all of them, but some seem pretty easy.

[Inverse Icarus]

actually both of those articles are floating around. this thread will get deleted (more likely locked) because it's a dupe, not because it's anti-firaxis. we have lots of those these days

ming, lemme say it!

CASE CLOSED.

hahaha i stole your thunder :P

[MarkG]

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?threadid=67087

[MarkG]

now that gamespot has gone as a pay site I guess they need not take bribe money.

gamespot DOES have civ3 ads....

I eagerly await for the mods to delete this post. Since it's not 100% flattering to fraxis.

simply closed as there is a thread about the gamespot review already. sorry that it wasnt deleted....

BTW, guys where is the patch? I mean it has been over a week now

there was a patch last week. you dont expect them to make one patch per week do you?