No one would dispute the validity of a Chinese civ, yes?
Yet, from the perspective of "race and ethnicity", the Chinese race is certainly not a homogeneous race. the northern elements are very influenced by Mongol, Turkic, and Tibetan elements, while the south is pretty much Sinicized Tai-Kadai tribes. How much of the original Shang Chinese blood still flow in modern Chinese? I don't know, but there's certainly not much.
In fact, a Chinese from Guangzhou is probably closer in genetics to a Thai, than to a Chinese from Beijing.
But why then is there no opposition to a Chinese civ?
It's because there is absolutely no way a Chinese from Guangzhou would ever identify with a Thai. Psychologically, culturally, linguistically, historically, in every way other than genetics, the Chinese nation is unified.
So, now to Arabs:
The original ancestors of the modern Arabs, in addition to the original Arabs of Medina, are the Berbers, Egyptians, Syrians, Phoenicians, Akkadians, Assyrians, even Sumerians and so on and on.
Yet, genetics and original "ancestry" aside, the Arab nation has a conscious idea of itself, as an ethnic, linguistic, and cultural entity.
So, why should there be any opposition to the Arab civ? Where would that come from?
Yet, from the perspective of "race and ethnicity", the Chinese race is certainly not a homogeneous race. the northern elements are very influenced by Mongol, Turkic, and Tibetan elements, while the south is pretty much Sinicized Tai-Kadai tribes. How much of the original Shang Chinese blood still flow in modern Chinese? I don't know, but there's certainly not much.
In fact, a Chinese from Guangzhou is probably closer in genetics to a Thai, than to a Chinese from Beijing.
But why then is there no opposition to a Chinese civ?
It's because there is absolutely no way a Chinese from Guangzhou would ever identify with a Thai. Psychologically, culturally, linguistically, historically, in every way other than genetics, the Chinese nation is unified.
So, now to Arabs:
The original ancestors of the modern Arabs, in addition to the original Arabs of Medina, are the Berbers, Egyptians, Syrians, Phoenicians, Akkadians, Assyrians, even Sumerians and so on and on.
Yet, genetics and original "ancestry" aside, the Arab nation has a conscious idea of itself, as an ethnic, linguistic, and cultural entity.
So, why should there be any opposition to the Arab civ? Where would that come from?
Comment