Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Redundancy in Civ3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redundancy in Civ3

    When I queue up 6 or 10 building in a construction queue, I still get the advisor asking me what to build next. I have already manually set the constructions, it should not require confirmation.

    When I queue up all the research of the current "era", I still get the advisor asking me what to research next. I have manually set all those already and just the same as the construction queues, should not require confirmation.

    Just venting it out because it's annoying me since the days when the advisor would start unit constructions without asking.
    35
    Yes, you are right, redundancy sux!
    40.00%
    14
    I'm careless.
    14.29%
    5
    No, you are wrong, I like reconfirming everything!
    28.57%
    10
    None of the above.
    17.14%
    6
    Vini, Vidi, Poluti.

  • #2
    Should be in "preferences"...

    Comment


    • #3
      I find it sometimes useful
      Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
      Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

      Comment


      • #4
        never use queues, so I have to abstain from voting
        But I agree with you, if you do use them.
        Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
        Then why call him God? - Epicurus

        Comment


        • #5
          Most redundant poll ever??

          Comment


          • #6
            All I have to say is that if you think Civ3 is redundant, try playing Civ1 or Civ2. Now that is redundancy
            Duddha: I will return...
            Arnelos: ... and the civilizied world shudders ...
            "I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. That, or Duder. His Dudeness. Or El Duderino, if, you know, you're not into the whole brevity thing..."
            Free California!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Duddha
              All I have to say is that if you think Civ3 is redundant, try playing Civ1 or Civ2.
              I have. I thiought they both were more fun that Civ 3.

              Comment


              • #8
                If you care so much about it, it should be a preference you could turn off. I personally don't care..
                Try my Lord of the Rings MAP out: Lands of Middle Earth v2 NEWS: Now It's a flat map, optimized for Conquests

                The new iPod nano: nano

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Coracle


                  I have. I thiought they both were more fun that Civ 3.
                  That's probably because you were younger when you played these games...
                  Often younger people enjoy computergames more than older ones... (not always of course)
                  Try my Lord of the Rings MAP out: Lands of Middle Earth v2 NEWS: Now It's a flat map, optimized for Conquests

                  The new iPod nano: nano

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Seems to me that Civ2 is more suited to more experienced strategists, while Civ3 is more like a kids game, it feels simple.

                    I agree on the building queues too, its a minor niggle that seems easily fixed.
                    Call to Power 2: Apolyton Edition - download the latest version (12th June 2011)
                    CtP2 AE Wiki & Modding Reference
                    One way to compile the CtP2 Source Code.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Maquiladora
                      Seems to me that Civ2 is more suited to more experienced strategists, while Civ3 is more like a kids game, it feels simple.

                      I agree on the building queues too, its a minor niggle that seems easily fixed.
                      Why?? I've played both.. civ2 is not more strategical..
                      Try my Lord of the Rings MAP out: Lands of Middle Earth v2 NEWS: Now It's a flat map, optimized for Conquests

                      The new iPod nano: nano

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        At any particular point in the game you have a hell of a lot more viable options open to you than you do in civ3.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I can say without any doubt, of any kind that Civ3 does NOT have less strategy than Civ2. If anything it has more.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I reconfirm like a mofo and like it. The queues still help since you don't have to search through the drop down menus; and its nice to get a little reminder of what's going on.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              OK, you got me... how does Civ3 have less strategy than Civ2?
                              Lime roots and treachery!
                              "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X