Everyone seems to agree that Incas should have been placed in civ3 PTW.... I couldn't agree more. This is a game called civilization! Incas had a great civ, and not only that it really satifies the lack of south american civilization thats in demand in world maps as everyone's been complaining about.
For PTW I will be doing the same thing I've been doing since Civ II. I will put civs in their geographical location as best as I can, but if there's no room for development, I'll just have to work around it. England usually gets placed in australia to make room for france and germany. Rome and Greece end up usually in South America cause of lack of room. Japan used to get Seoul (korean capitol) cause leaving Japan in an island could be seriously inhibiting for its growth. So as I have been doing, PTW will be handled the same way for me, but I have to agree I don't like shifting nations like that.
For PTW I will be doing the same thing I've been doing since Civ II. I will put civs in their geographical location as best as I can, but if there's no room for development, I'll just have to work around it. England usually gets placed in australia to make room for france and germany. Rome and Greece end up usually in South America cause of lack of room. Japan used to get Seoul (korean capitol) cause leaving Japan in an island could be seriously inhibiting for its growth. So as I have been doing, PTW will be handled the same way for me, but I have to agree I don't like shifting nations like that.
Comment