Why only develop great leaders through combat? And why only apply them to armies or rushing wonders? Why not develop great leaders through negotiation (Benjamin Disraeli)? Or through political strife (Ghandi)? Or through monetary expertise (Randolph Hearst)? Or through political maneuvering (Teddy Roosevelt)? Or through scientific achievement (Einstein, Edison, Carver)? And why not have them affect other things in the game like reducing unrest or speeding research or adding a city or boosting a cities population? Great leaders come in all types in the real world.
![Cool](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Comment