Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genghis Khan Portrayal: Offensive or Not?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Carver
    Why is the childish smile necessary? The obvious implication is that Asians and "Indians" are children, or at least have the minds of children.
    The picture probably represents Ghengis when he is gracious. I bet that he doesn't smile like that when furious. You are taking a wild leap when saying that Firaxis presents Asians as being childlike. Completely absurd. I'll ask again: what do you think about Firaxis' presentation of other Asain nations?
    "The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is to have with them as little political connection as possible... It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far as we are now at liberty to do it." George Washington- September 19, 1796

    Comment


    • #17
      I've seen the video clips of Genghis and Isabella changing their expressions gradually and the former is noticeably more comically ape-like than the latter.

      As for the other Asian great leaders, I think that Mao is portrayed as a "ha-ha, jokey-jokey" kind of character which I find funny but somewhat disturbing.

      I don't think I really have a problem with Tokugawa, but that may be because we in the West have so much more respect for the Japanese than the other Asians.

      Anyhow, I have a great deal of respect for Genghis and I think he deserves to be portrayed as something more than what appears to be a toothless, beady-eyed monkey.
      "I've spent more time posting than playing."

      Comment


      • #18
        Joan of Arc bald is quite flattering. The smiles for all the people look incredibly ... weird. I really don't find anything offensive. As has been said, they're all caricatures, they're not really meant to look exactly like them is it? It's doubtful most leaders would be flattered if they saw their likeness in Civ III...

        Comment


        • #19
          I find that you are all whining over a silly subject. Uglyness is fact. Why bother? I would think if your life was much like that of Ghengis Khan then you'd look like that.
          Grrr | Pieter Lootsma | Hamilton, NZ | grrr@orcon.net.nz
          Waikato University, Hamilton.

          Comment


          • #20
            Siredgar,
            The picture is not offensive (or at least no more than any other leader, all of which are caricatures). In actual fact Ghenghis probably looked even uglier than in the picture. The Mongols ritually scarred themselves on their cheeks for instance. They coated their entire skin in animal fat to keep warm. Most of his life if not all of it he would have looked and dressed pretty much like everyone else in the army - being "one of the guys" was part of his success.

            The portait you point out is complete fiction. First of all, it was drawn long after Ghengis was dead. It was part of a series of Mongol Khan portraits by a Chinese artist late in the Yuan dynasty, as part of an attempt to give that dynasty Chinese legitimacy. Note how Ghengis looks basically like any other Chinese emperor - that's purposeful propaganda. There's a famous painting of Kublai Khan that is part of the same series you can see here:

            http://www.chinapage.org/painting/kublai.html

            Kublai probably looked very much like that, being very Chinese in his ways by the end of his life, but not so Ghengis.

            I agree the game has some issues with being PC (such as having personality stereotypes for each civ), but this is not one of them.

            Comment


            • #21
              I prescribe a liberal dose of pills, not too many though. If I were a doctor, you could cash this in at the gates of happy land.
              (\__/)
              (='.'=)
              (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

              Comment


              • #22
                Who the hell cares what they look like. As long as they at least vaguely resemble their real-life counterparts, then that's just fine. Anyway, if you hate the way they look, get a graphics tool and mod a new portrait for them. Its that simple people. Just think about it.
                "Corporation, n, An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." -- Ambrose Bierce
                "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." -- Benjamin Franklin
                "Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction." -- Thomas Jefferson

                Comment


                • #23
                  I am spanish, and I think that Isabella looks very atractive, and the Khan looks like gollum, or an orc, and I do not like it at all, it is not that I find it offensive, it is just that I never herad that he was related with the hunchback???(spelling) of Notre Dame

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Is it me or has anyone else thought that Xerxes in the modern ages looks like Howard Stern?
                    signature not visible until patch comes out.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by siredgar
                      As for the other Asian great leaders, I think that Mao is portrayed as a "ha-ha, jokey-jokey" kind of character which I find funny but somewhat disturbing.

                      I don't think I really have a problem with Tokugawa, but that may be because we in the West have so much more respect for the Japanese than the other Asians.
                      i sincerely hope you are joking. aside from a general reccomendation of 'we in the west' type, try perceiving this as a game, not a unique opportunity to promote multicultural respect and co-existance. you are trying to pound everyone into submission.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        This is silly. The faces are not offensive. They are caricatures. I hate these PC things...
                        I watched you fall. I think I pushed.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Genghis Khan Portrayal: Offensive or Not?

                          Originally posted by siredgar
                          Just because he was a barbarian ruler doesn't mean he should be portrayed as an ugly idiot, too.

                          Compare with this painting:

                          http://acc6.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~p...es/genghis.jpg
                          lol
                          Bleh

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Besides, it will be fun to play against Genghis, his angry face must be absolutely scary.
                            I watched you fall. I think I pushed.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              All I know is that is will be fun to kick Genghis' ass!


                              Not offensive. As said before, a bald J of A is more offensive. But who cares?
                              Sorry....nothing to say!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Genghis Khan Portrayal: Offensive or Not?

                                Originally posted by siredgar
                                Just because he was a barbarian ruler doesn't mean he should be portrayed as an ugly idiot, too.

                                Compare with this painting:

                                http://acc6.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~p...es/genghis.jpg
                                well it appears you are bored or ignorant or both? No offense, but hell if you about to call Firaxis racist or intending to be, then you have already taken off your gloves.
                                When i first saw the pic i was like "WOW, and accurate pic of the man for once!" I was happy with the difference. Diversity is good, this isnt a game of placebos for people that love to complain.
                                Its a game for history/strategy gamers and people like us think its either 1. Find it very Funny. Not in bad ways, because once you know alot about history, you become jaded, and idealized pictures are worse.
                                2. Dont care. A large majority have the idea that these are not attempts at 'actual' portraits for godsakes. They just like to see a different face when they talk to a different civ, remember diversity is our friend. Read Harlan's post, that man knows his stuff.

                                In closing, you made me really frustrated and slightly offended. I think Genghis having an ugly and rugged face depicts the mongols well, as for the teeth, they had to chew deer hides with their teeth, you do that for years on end and tell me how good your teeth come out ok?
                                Please, refrain from calling people racist, its a low blow.
                                Civ Fanatic
                                aka "Shadow Soldier"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X