2 Man Civ

[kermit_the_frog]

I have this idea of a game that sounds fun...

Player a and b plays civ 1
Player c and d plays civ 2
Player e and f player civ 3.

So this means that we have to generate a e - mail for the propose... I wold like to try with 3 civs. I would need somebody to genorate game for me...

[kermit_the_frog]

Anyone care to join (too hold thread alive)

[kermit_the_frog]

anyone???

[kermit_the_frog]

plz type if u think this is a good or bad idea

[kermit_the_frog]

me is waiting for somebody to reply....

[sabrewolf]

patience, patience

you mean more players? that means even likelier that it will slow down...
not sure if i like it

but i would join in the other way round: 3 players play 6 civs

[kermit_the_frog]

hmmm ok lets do this the other way around since it look like nobody wants to join this game. Sabrewolf make a new tread

[sabrewolf]

i'm not ready yet to organise a new thread as there is one currently in development. maybe after that

but anyway, if i open a thread, the same people who mostly join me will be there

why don't you open it? :-P

call it "double trouble PBEM" or something like that
i'd recommend 3-4 players playing 6-8 civs on a small or stardard map. fill up with (monarch or higher) AI if neccessary (eg. if only 6 human civs)

[kermit_the_frog]

I would like to open a game on regent difficulty..

[sabrewolf]

ok, you could do that.
but don't forget that playing 2 civs, you've got a big advantage against the AI. you know where you are, you can combine researching goals, chose your wars, trade resources, etc.

but it's your game, so you could even go for cheiftain if you want to

[kermit_the_frog]

this is the new thread Double the fun