As I recall, this game can't be upgraded to v1.22 because it was not a modded game.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Balderdash PBEM
Collapse
X
-
:sigh:
This game has died so many times that I have become quite convinced that it must be undead. Sure, it shows occassional signs of animation and continues to rise when it falls, but can you really call what it possesses life?Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game
Comment
-
As I have the last save, I officially pronounce this game dead.
I would love to have a new game, or a replay, or something, in 1.22.
Anybody up for it? Same general rules?If you're interested in participating in the first Civ 5 Community Game then please visit: http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/forum.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rommel2D
Has anyone actually tried to upgrade the save? Non-modded games are still upgradable as long as the Radio tech hasn't been researched yet...
If this game is dying though, I'm not interested in playing it again. Let Rommel2D take my place if he wants it.
Comment
-
We NEED a new IMPROVED Balderdash!!!!!!!!
Speaking of Balderdash we ought to restart this one IN A NEW THREAD, with only four, maybe 5 players.
It should be a Pangea map so we could meet relatively quickly.
The rest I would be flexible about.
It should be myself (of course), Beta, Zargon (so I can make fun of liberals and make fun of Canadians), GodKing (so I can make fun of a fellow engineer.) and then maybe Uber or GF(so I can make fun of people whom we all like to make fun of)
Im open to who would play but anything beyond 5 players, Im out. PBEM's just dont seem to work with too many players.*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
Comment
-
Re: We NEED a new IMPROVED Balderdash!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by conmcb25
Speaking of Balderdash we ought to restart this one IN A NEW THREAD, with only four, maybe 5 players.
It should be a Pangea map so we could meet relatively quickly.
The rest I would be flexible about.
It should be myself (of course), Beta, Zargon (so I can make fun of liberals and make fun of Canadians), GodKing (so I can make fun of a fellow engineer.) and then maybe Uber or GF(so I can make fun of people whom we all like to make fun of)
Comment
-
Re: Re: We NEED a new IMPROVED Balderdash!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by GhengisFarb
I'm in, but can we make 1.22? I've been able to purge my Conquests pbems to just 1.22 versions.*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
Comment
-
I AM CANADIAN! AND I AM READY!
Not only that con, I am a liberal Canadian, which puts me right of the political spectrum you folks have down there.
I would go for 6 players. I am just not a big fan of 4 and 5 player games.
Pangaea.
And someone to check to make sure there are no island starts.
And btw - you snivellling bunch of wusses are toast already.Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war .... aw, forget that nonsense. Beer, please.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beta
I would go for 6 players. I am just not a big fan of 4 and 5 player games.
Originally posted by Beta
And btw - you snivellling bunch of wusses are toast already.
(Thats why I put you in the same category as Zargon, I needed an American and a Canadian liberal to make fun off. The nice thing about you is you do double duty, I can make fun of BOTH!!! )*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
Comment
Comment