Have recent world events changed your playing style?

[HazieDaVampire]

Recent events havn't changed my playing style, but wolrd history in General has, i now love getting an island on the other side of the world and called it "Falklands", and then getting it invaded and bringing in a carrier task force!
I love full on D-day beach landings, with the Paras going in a turn before the marines, and massive naval bombardments!

[pedrojedi]

Heh, what was that anyway? Just getting an island for some grades in Antartida seems so cheap.

[dworkin]

My attitude is that all the world's resources are mine (luxuries, strategic, gold) and that the ignorant savages (AI civs) will be made aware of this in due course.

I used to think this the attitude of imperialistic bastards and sadistic gamers.

However, with every episode of 'When Democracies Attack' I am not so sure.

[ALPHA WOLF 64]

Originally posted by dworkin
However, with every episode of 'When Democracies Attack' I am not so sure.

is this the show between "when animals attack" and cops? bad boy bad boy, who ya gonna attack next....LOL

[Master Zen]

Recent events have only made me change one aspect of my game style:

The USA, wherever it is on the map, and no matter how weak or strong it is, is my victim

I do prefer it being strong...much more of a challange, much more satisfying.

[Jaguar]

I fight wars of aggression all the time, but I'm nice to the conquered people. That has never changed with me.

[Ubergeek]

You're NICE to them? Hmm, I tend to starve them down to size 1 myself, but whatever floats your boat...

[ALPHA WOLF 64]

i nuc them so they are happy

i have to say that that is probably the stupidiest thing that happens in the game. i'd rather see 100 spears beat 100 tanks, than a single city be happy for getting nuc'ed.

[Ubergeek]

They're just PRETENDING to be happy so you don't nuke them again. They may be abstract simulations of populace, but they're not stupid.