any suggestions???
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
new poll?
Collapse
X
-
quote:
Originally posted by Andz83 on 11-17-2000 09:39 AM
"Why shouldn't MarkG be the forum's administrator any longer?"
Andz!!! You evil, EVIL man!!!!
------------------
Who am I? What am I? Do we need Civ? Yes!!
birteaw@online.noDo not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
Also active on WePlayCiv.
Comment
-
Here's an idea recently spurred from a recent post on the Massively Multiplayer CIV3 thread:
How many people would be interested in playing a multiplayer Civ 3 over the internet against/with other humans?I don't have much to say 'cause I won't be here long.
Comment
-
"Should Civ3 have 3d graphics"
*yes
*not a new engine but new grphx
*no
Or something to this effect.
In my opinion this is one of the mahor issues with Civ3. Even though sid's already said the game will have a new engine the question remains - should it be all 3d?
Refer to Civ III Engine Proposal.
BTW is this a poll on a poll?
------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
Comment
-
-
Dear MarkG,
I would like to suggest a poll about the historical period we would prefer for CivIII. Something like:- At what historical date should CivIII start?
My answer: at 8000BC - At what historical date should CivIII end?
My answer: at 2000AD - What year should turn-wise be the middle of the game?
My answer: at 3000BC
Sincere regards!Jews have the Torah, Zionists have a State
Comment
- At what historical date should CivIII start?
-
Doh! Don't think I was around then... do it again!quote:
we already had a poll on graphics
------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
Comment
-
A poll about the endgame:
How do you want the game end?
Some of CIV 2/SMAC ending (e.g. Sending Starship to Alpha Centauri or Cornering the global market) are kind of an open end to the game, IMHO.
At that point do you prefer that you are checked against a "very big crisis" just to test how good your empire truly is?
1. No, let game go on as usual (CIV 2) until the starship arrival
2. Coming of aliens (same as in SMACX, but as a "very powerful" sort of barbarians), that you must survive to
3. Asteroids suddendly discovered approaching Earth, you must save enough people to the disasterous hitting
4. Global Climate major change, you must move cities population or improve them with specials enhancements to cope with changes
5. Main disease striking earth, you must save enough people, helping with research and special building, cutting trades, travels etc.
You can put things as long as the Unity Space Ships' survivors came back from Chiron, to help you (e.g. 400 years?)
Ok, some others "Armageddon" can be added. Your turn.
------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant"We are reducing all the complexity of billions of people over 6000 years into a Civ box. Let me say: That's not only a PkZip effort....it's a real 'picture to Jpeg heavy loss in translation' kind of thing."
- Admiral Naismith
Comment
-
How about a poll on whether or not players will want the game to be released on time, or will be willing to wait, if neccessary, for a much better game. Say, for example:
Would you be willing to wait, if necessary, until Xmas 2001 for a much better game?
In my opinion, the answer to this question is YES!! YES!! YES!! I just think that August 2001 is really pushing it, and I'd be willing to wait 'till Xmas for a better game than to be impatient and end up with something very crumby and not worth my money!! Plus, it'd make a nice gift under the Xmas tree.
------------------
Zero
[This message has been edited by Zero_Tolerance (edited November 22, 2000).]
Comment
-
I think right about the time I came there was a poll on when do you think the game would be released...
------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)
Comment
-
quote:
Originally posted by UltraSonix on 11-22-2000 09:16 PM
I think right about the time I came there was a poll on when do you think the game would be released...
Maybe so, though I can't seem to locate such a poll in the archives. But the poll's focus would be specifically on delaying the game to wait on a better game, if necessary.
------------------
Zero (formerly jrhughes98)
Comment
Comment