Originally posted by The_Aussie_Lurker
Well, I ALWAYS stick it out to the bitter end becuase I reckon "Hell, if the real-life Egyptians could make a go of a DESERT, then I can't complain!" .
What surprises me, though, is that no-one has voted for "whines that Civ3 sucks" option, given the number of people who do claim it sucks here on the forum! .
Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
Well, I ALWAYS stick it out to the bitter end becuase I reckon "Hell, if the real-life Egyptians could make a go of a DESERT, then I can't complain!" .
What surprises me, though, is that no-one has voted for "whines that Civ3 sucks" option, given the number of people who do claim it sucks here on the forum! .
Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
Sorry to throw a spanner into your argument, but 2500 years ago Egypt was a lush tropical landscape.
There is extensive water erosion on the sphinx, a sign of regular rainfall, something that doesn't exist in the are nowadays. Add to that the fact that heiroglyphics (sp?) show animals that no longer reside in the area, and would need a lush environment to survive in. Plus, well, there is their written history that tells us what Egypt was like back then.....
Comment