Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

We already have CIV3...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I didnt' bother buying CTP because I was so disappointed in SMAC
    Apolyton Empress
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just and earth bound misfit..."

    "Sanity is the playground for the unimaginative" --found on a bathroom wall

    Comment


    • #17
      Progress from Civ2 to SMAC was probably like the one from Civ1 to Civ2. The reason so many people were thrown off by it was its setting, namely the future which people couldn't relate to. In concept, SMAC is excellent. Because the story is "set" people feel like they have lost a certain amount of control.
      *grumbles about work*

      Comment


      • #18
        Yes, that´s it! SMAC was great but the fractions took a great deal of freedom from the player as the story did!
        But nevertheless SMAC has great roots!

        ------------------
        ----Mongolia Rules------
        ----Mongolia Rules------

        Comment


        • #19
          SMAC sucked because all the editing tools sucked.

          Comment


          • #20
            So I'm not the only one who didn't play SMAC. And I thought I was the only one.

            As a side note did anyone enjoy the description part of the CtP advances- that was one of the few things they did well?
            "The free market is ugly and stupid, like going to the mall; the unfree market is just as ugly and just as stupid, except there is nothing in the mall and if you don't go there they shoot you." - P.J. O'Rourke

            Comment


            • #21
              description part?

              Comment


              • #22
                I don't play SMAC anymore because I couldn't identify myself with the future setting.
                Nevertheless it's been a great advance in many aspects.

                Comment

                Working...
                X