Despite all appearances, I am not intentionally throwing down the gauntlet to anybody here at Apolyton. These opinions expressed herein are my own, and I wanted to share them specifically for the purpose of seeing the response of a community such as this.
We could go on, but why? Civilization III is an obvious failure that will never be solved
Still, I feel the need to point out a select few things:
Napoleon, Wellington, Patton, Sun Tzu, Pancho Villa, Attila the Hun, and Yamamoto would make welcome additions to the unit pool
2) Try playing Civ3 sometime. There are privateers.
After a decade or so, resource squares should be rendered fallow or depleted of their special properties.
As for attack or movement options, coastal cities should be able to fire on passing vessels from harbor defenses
Ah, scenarios, the next major downfall of Civilization III – in that they didn’t exist. Its second predecessor offered Roman and World War games besides the standard fare, each of which provided additional hours of gameplay. Civilization III was expected to provide so much more besides.
Comment