Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Difficulty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Emperor, but the Mini Tourney IV is probably my last game I play here... it's getting too easy. Deity is quite intimidating, which is why I haven't tried it yet. But unlike others I play each level until I'm bored, and can win in every situation. Changing to the next then means that each time it is a completely other game, that you know little about.

    One problem, though, going back a level is not possible without being bored silly, I tried Monarch a few games back, and had to quit after an hour because the game was essentially won... all the ancient wonders, ~20 times the culture as the second in place, half of all cities in existence... no fun at all

    DeepO

    Comment


    • #32
      I suck... Regent. However, lately I'm defeating it, switched some strategies, did stuff, and after two or three more wins on Regent I'll go for Monarch.
      Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
      Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
      I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Ferdi
        I am not sure people who voted deity or emperor are playing with the standard rules or without restarting when their initial position is not good.

        I voted regent but with standard rules, large map and with any starting position (even without fresh water some times).
        I voted emperor and I play with standard rules. On deity I'll restart if the position sucks (but I dont play it often).
        We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
        If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
        Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

        Comment

        Working...
        X