The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
in my next game i'm going to set the barbarians up with musketeers. it should make the whole game more interesting.
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
Originally posted by UberKruX
in my next game i'm going to set the barbarians up with musketeers. it should make the whole game more interesting.
That may be a way to cheat or exploit on a higher level: play on hordes, with a cavs or marines as barbs. start on an island, with one or two encampments, which you can destroy by planting a city there. the AIs won't be able to handle it at all, will keep them retarded, so that you can swoop in.
I attacked the civ I shared my continent with, with a massive tank swarm (about 100 tanks). To make life easy for me I razed 90% of the cities, which left a lot of available land. 3 turns later when I went to fill in the gaps with my settlers some barbs had set up camp. My tanks did not have much trouble with the single warrior in each camp. I miss the late game barb (muskets and cannons) that attacked in Civ2.
IMO most parts of Civ3 are improved, but Barbarians were a lot better in Civ2
I attacked the civ I shared my continent with, with a massive tank swarm (about 100 tanks). To make life easy for me I razed 90% of the cities, which left a lot of available land. 3 turns later when I went to fill in the gaps with my settlers some barbs had set up camp. My tanks did not have much trouble with the single warrior in each camp. I miss the late game barb (muskets and cannons) that attacked in Civ2.
IMO most parts of Civ3 are improved, but Barbarians were a lot better in Civ2
was this in response to my post? I was talking about having cavs as the barbs, not warriors. Of course tanks won't have a problem with constcript warriors. And I was talking about an early game scenario, not a mopping up situation.
Or, you could take both those names, since they both seem to apply.
Lime roots and treachery!
"Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten
was this in response to my post? I was talking about having cavs as the barbs, not warriors. Of course tanks won't have a problem with constcript warriors. And I was talking about an early game scenario, not a mopping up situation.
Sorry I was answering the original question, not respoding to your post.
Okay now I read your post and will respond.
I think your right. However with the AI set to expand rapidly, the AI might accidentally set a city down in the right spot too.
You could really take this idea to the extreme. Give Barbs modern armor to start with and place all of the civs on large continents. Place your civ on a small island and you may be able to get a very fast victory. That would be very boring, but your Hall of Fame would look great!
Originally posted by louiethelesbo
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton could be the leaders of the barbarians we could nickname them...dumb and dumber.
Instead of attacking your civ, they'll play the race card (since all your military units are white men), then do a massive government shake-down to get you to be their political pawn. At which point you lose the game.
I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!
Comment