Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I want the Senate back!! - with improvements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I want the Senate back!! - with improvements

    This is a big one, but I have to elaborate....

    The Senate, and the control it exerted over the Leader`s foreign policy, its sensitivity towards it was one of the main aspects of the Republican form of Government on CIVII. That (Republic) was much the opposite to Monarchy or an Absolute Government, where your rule was uncheked and as such, you could push for an agressive foreign policy, investing heavily on the military in detriment to civil works, and geting away with it, since it took 2 or 3 units to impose martial law and crush civil disorder, besides the restricted liberty being inherent to the regime.

    But if this very nature of Absolute governments favored the Civ`s initial expansion through military means, also it would affect the maintenance of its established position due to the high levels of corruption, limited economic growth (shields) and slow cientific research.

    Compared to it, a Republican regime offered higher and faster production and growth, faster cientific research, a limited rate of corruption and higher tax revenues. However, it restricted an agressive foreign policy, forcing the Leader to decide to cancel or avoid military compromises to other CIVs which might lead to war; in a Republic, a war he/she might not be able to conduct to the desired end, because of a peace treaty or cease-fire imposed by the Senate.

    As such, even if the Leader choose to "un-bury the hatchet", declaration of war on other CIVs, on the continuance of it against the CIVs main enemy would be subjected to deliberation by the Senate, where you could hope the "Hawk-party to derail interference" or the passing of a "resolution authorazing the action".

    And thats what made playing a Republic the more fun! You had to balance that what you wanted with a Senate who might refuse to give it to you. And I think this particularity of CIVII should come back to CIVIII, and more, it should be perfected. For example:

    _like the Senate having a say on the tax rate you want to impose or in the scientific advance you have to choose to research or even the limit of military forces (units) of your CIVs Order of Battle, having the power to disband units.

    _and the leader too, influencing the Senate`s decisions with bribes or public works on the most important cities-for a Republic is a Federation of City-States, with every City having its own representation through a Senator with a vote, the bigger cities having more votes, with stronger Senators- and also, your alliances or peace treaties with other CIVs being subject to ratification and approval by the Senate.

    The voting system could be like this:
    Cities size 16 or more - 4 votes
    size 12 - 3 votes
    size 08 - 2 votes
    size 06 - 1 vote
    size 05 or lower - no vote, without representation

    the city`s/ senator`s vote could be achieved by:

    -building specific public work - vote for 8 turns
    -building small wonder - vote for 20 turns
    -building Big wonder - vote guaranteed till the wonder gets obsolete

    Also, the Leader could buy the vote, in this case
    -vote for 2 turns and increase of 25% corruption and waste in the city

    the corruption would be attenuated by a court house, but with it, it would be harder or more expensive to buy a vote

    if discovered, the treasury would loose the value paid for the vote, the value of the bribery-as compensation to the public coffers;
    the city would loose 1 vote, if size 8 or highter, if size 6, the vote would be always negative; or bribery could happen only in cities size 8 or higher

    and the more briberies are discovered, the Leader permanently looses votes from other cities, until the Republic collapses, government falls and anarchy reigns. And you cant have another Republic for some 30 turns.

    Well, anyway this is just an idea, like so many others that came. In short, my message is: I WANT THE SENATE BACK, THE SENATE IS FUN TO PLAY WITH, I guess other CIV players think like me, I wouldnt be surprised if a thread like this hasnt shown up before.
    Comment, replies, out-raged bursts of indignation, just answer to this thread.

    P.S.: If "The return of the Senate" happens to have a good answer, can we tell the Infopatchers to work this out on the next version? Can they do it? Will they? Has an idea that came from these Forums been incorporated in the game before? Anyway, as im not a computer programer could this be put in the game? As a patch?

  • #2
    i never liked those whiney ass b1tches that told me i can't declare war... but then again i almost never use a democracy in civ3...
    "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
    - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

    Comment


    • #3
      I'd like the Senate back - only if I have the option to declare martial law and shoot Tom Daschle.

      Comment


      • #4
        Why would you want a bunch of wimps running your country and conspiring behind your back to end a war? I remember being at war in Civ II, losing a city and then the senate sign a ceasefire, even though I had the troops necessary and ready to retake the city. Its as if they don't give a damn about the people oppressed by the foreign power from halfway across the world. And here I am trying to hold an empire that spans across the whole continent, and the senate says I can't shoot the invaders that aren't even from my part of the world.

        Despite this, there is some potential for the idea of a senate. As long as they are simply involved in civilian affairs, and have no power over your military deployment.
        "Corporation, n, An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." -- Ambrose Bierce
        "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." -- Benjamin Franklin
        "Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction." -- Thomas Jefferson

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Coracle
          I'd like the Senate back - only if I have the option to declare martial law and shoot Tom Daschle.
          Making threats against an elected leader in the United States is a federal offense. The Marshal's will be at your door soon. Go with them quietly.
          Sorry....nothing to say!

          Comment


          • #6
            Quoting:

            i never liked those whiney ass b1tches that told me i can't declare war... but then again i almost never use a democracy in civ3...

            UberKruX
            _______________________
            Why would you want a bunch of wimps running your country and conspiring behind your back to end a war? I remember being at war in Civ II, losing a city and then the senate sign a ceasefire, even though I had the troops necessary and ready to retake the city. Its as if they don't give a damn about the people oppressed by the foreign power from halfway across the world. And here I am trying to hold an empire that spans across the whole continent, and the senate says I can't shoot the invaders that aren't even from my part of the world.

            LordAzreal
            ________________________

            About UberKruX:

            But thats the point! A Republic is carachterized by the lack of absolute power in the hands of the CIV`s Leader. It comes with the fact that to achieve its performance in economic growth and scientific research, there`s this greater, far greater independence of the people, the cities from the ruler, which is exemplified by the existence of this independent Senate.

            About LordAzreal:

            Also, as I was explaining in the text, development of a CIV from an absolute form of government into a Republic should come after the CIV has consolidated its territory and has no appetite for more lands to conquer.

            That the Senate would go chicken and grant a cease-fire and then peace as LordAzreal pointed out I agree that its something that had to be worked out more, hence I want the Senate back, but with improvements.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'd have to say that I agree here. It would be nice if at least ONE government in Civ3 was subject to the 'evil' senate. Although it could be a pain at times it did add fun to gameplay to know that you would be unable to do certain things because the Senate would overrule them.

              But there would have to be changes. Like a 'grace period' where the leader of a country has x number of turns to play out his conquest before the senate can pull the plug. Much like in our country (US anyway) where the president has absolute power if he wishes to wage war, etc without the approval of the house and senate for 30 days? (or was it 60?) reguardless that would be a fun little safeguard to put in as to keep it from being TOO restrictive.

              Also they'd have to add the option to dissolve the Senate - for when those whimpering little politicians stabbed you in the back one too many times.

              They also need to add CEASE FIRE agreements along with full peace agreements! maybe you dont want to make peace with someone, but you want them to quit hurling units at you endlessly? heh

              Chaing
              You're a star-belly sneech, you suck it like a leech! You want everyone to act like you. Kiss ass while you ***** so you can get rich while your boss gets richer off you! Well you'll work harder with a gun in your back, for a bowl of rice a day. Slave to soldiers til you starve, then your heads impaled on a stake!

              The framework of the world is - black and white! The infrastructure builders - flex their might! Turning true emotion into digital expression, one by one we all fall down. The grey race shrivels, trapped inside. The world it creates is black and white.

              Comment


              • #8
                They also need to add CEASE FIRE agreements along with full peace agreements! maybe you dont want to make peace with someone, but you want them to quit hurling units at you endlessly? heh

                Cease fire is a definate need for diplomacy.

                About the Senate, I don't miss it much. I feel it was more pain than it was worth. When I play Civ I want to be a god. (That's how the original Civ was marketed) I want to direct and lead. I don't the Senate telling me a can't kick someone's @$$.
                Sorry....nothing to say!

                Comment


                • #9
                  NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

                  No senate. This is THE number one reason I would take civ3 over any other civ game.

                  I'm not going to sit there, while UberKruX stations troopers on every tile around my capital, and not be able to kill them. If that's not a threat, I don't know what is!
                  I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ACooper


                    Making threats against an elected leader in the United States is a federal offense. The Marshal's will be at your door soon. Go with them quietly.
                    Cooper, are you like..a thought policeman?

                    Just doing what you can to provide a clean and wholesome internet experience?

                    Also, is it possible to post anything on any subject anywhere at anytime that you will not object to in someway, shape or form?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by jimmytrick


                      Cooper, are you like..a thought policeman?

                      Just doing what you can to provide a clean and wholesome internet experience?

                      Also, is it possible to post anything on any subject anywhere at anytime that you will not object to in someway, shape or form?
                      Sorry. Probably not. Keep tryin'.
                      Sorry....nothing to say!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        No thanks. I have always hated the senate.
                        Grrr | Pieter Lootsma | Hamilton, NZ | grrr@orcon.net.nz
                        Waikato University, Hamilton.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          My main complaint against the senate was that the AI civs always seemed to be able to ignore it. I'd scarcely be able to force a war, but AI republics seemed to happily attack at will.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The AI cheats. Live with it. It is not as if Firaxis will make a proper AI that doesn't.
                            Grrr | Pieter Lootsma | Hamilton, NZ | grrr@orcon.net.nz
                            Waikato University, Hamilton.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              A senate would be a good idea if it weren't so brainless as the one in Civ2. The Civ2 senate based its decisions only on blind chance, and the 100% for peace attitude of a democracy doesn't reflect any realistic country. Ever heard of the gulf of Tonkin resolution?

                              I would love a senate with some sense, working on the same basic ideas as war weariness. Still, we need some randomness thrown in, because you can never fully predict government.

                              Also, is it possible to post anything on any subject anywhere at anytime that you will not object to in someway, shape or form?
                              I'm surprised that you haven't yet mentioned that to your running dog Coracle, for whom ACooper's quote was meant for. He may be testing a new theory that Coracle only responds to threats against his person with the authority of the US government, rather than logic that most of us understand and accept as reasonable people.
                              Lime roots and treachery!
                              "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X