If real life were Civ III who would have the LOWEST end score?

[DrFell]

Iroquois definitely. Not around for that long (not as the confederacy anyway), absolutely no achievements really. Zulus are fairly close behind, and Aztecs a little further off (at least they had cities). The Babylonians might have been conquered a long time ago, and several times, but at least they managed to build wonders and 'culture', so they're a no. Persians conquered a large empire and were around for a while and they build a 'Forbidden Palace'. India is still around now and with huge population etc. so it couldn't be them.

[KrazyHorse]

The Zulus had cities. Isandlwana had a population of ~30 000.

[Harovan]

Originally posted by sadistiq
hmmm may explain why you aren't in the game

Iraq is in the game. It's called Babylon. Not quite the same, but close.

[player1]

Originally posted by Sir Ralph


Iraq is in the game. It's called Babylon. Not quite the same, but close.

I'm not sure, but doesn't they claim that they are descendents of Persians.
(both Iraq & Iran)

[Harovan]

May be because they were conquered by the Persians. This was why I said, that it's not quite the same, all there is a bit messed. Romans also aren't quite the predecessors of today's Italians, but Italians are Romans+Langobards mixed.

[Thrawn05]

Originally posted by player1


I'm not sure, but doesn't they claim that they are descendents of Persians.
(both Iraq & Iran)

Didn't Alexander destroy those civs?

[kittenOFchaos]

Zulus...