If real life were Civ III who would have the LOWEST end score?

[TheDarkCavalier]

Can't really make a poll on that, but here goes...

[Anti Spectator]

The Americans of course

[Rotten999]

France.

[KrazyHorse]

Can I get a "Duh"...

Iroquois. Total population probably <250 000, virtually no cities, small area, minimal architecture.

[Thrawn05]

Any of the following (no particular order):

Babylonians
Persians
Zulus
Aztecs
Iroquois

I want to say India, but I'm unsure. So I won't.

[Lawrence of Arabia]

Zulu or Iroquois

[Scooby_Doo]

I think the Iroquois do stand a chance in that they were going for thousands of years, although admittedly they never really did anything that much.
The Zulu I would have thought would be low middle, not bottom, they did survive right up to the early 20th century, unless I'm mistaken (which I probably am, feel free to correct me)
I would have thought the Aztecs could be quite low but again, not bottom.

After all that ranting, I'd probably have to go with either the Iroquois or the Zulu although I would be surprised if it really was the Zulu.

[MrWhereItsAt]

Come ON! It's gotta be the Babylonians. There were a few periods they had some territory, but not much and not for long. They were conquered often. There weren't that many cultural improvements in their cities (not many pre-req techs discovered) and the only wonder they had is the Hanging Gardens. They had it for, oh, 150 years (?) before being conquered by Persia in 539BC. Bam. No more history.

[sadistiq]

not trying to be cultuarally biased or anything (or maybe I am)
but to the guy who posted from Iraq: how did you get a game made in America in the first place????
I was under the assumption we had a trade embargo with you....
hmmm may explain why you aren't in the game

[Oligarf]

Originally posted by Anti Spectator
The Americans of course

Only looking at culture of course.

[player1]

Originally posted by sadistiq
not trying to be cultuarally biased or anything (or maybe I am)
but to the guy who posted from Iraq: how did you get a game made in America in the first place????
I was under the assumption we had a trade embargo with you....
hmmm may explain why you aren't in the game

My country had embargo form 91-95 and then 97-2000

And you know what?
We palyed all games available at Amrerica.

And for much cheaper price.

Now, these days are over.
After-emargo was lifted, anti-piracy laws made their place.

[Rotten999]

Don't mess with USA, because...

Our words are backed by nuclear weapons!

I thought Yugoslavia had broken up.

[Evil Robot]

Somehow I really don't think the trade sanctions were in place to prevent people from playing compute games...

[player1]

Originally posted by Rotten999
Don't mess with USA, because...

Our words are backed by nuclear weapons!

I thought Yugoslavia had broken up.

Yes it had (old one).

This reffers to Serbia & Montenegro (new one).

Maybe we chage the name in future.

[Thrawn05]

Originally posted by player1


Yes it had (old one).

This reffers to Serbia & Montenegro (new one).

Maybe we chage the name in future.

I'm not that old, but I keep thinking Austro-Hungarian Empire. Oh well, silly me.