What needs to be done to make this game great.

[Zachriel]

Civ3 is a great game, and will get better with time. Sorry some of you are missing out on the early action. Hopefully, you rejoin us as the game develops.

Lighten up! Have some fun.

[Martin Gühmann]

Originally posted by Zachriel
Civ3 is a great game, and will get better with time. Sorry some of you are missing out on the early action. Hopefully, you rejoin us as the game develops.

Rejoining

Hey you can't fix the main problems like obsolete and time wasting tile improving sytem or the time wasting building complete popup messages and replace them by a more efficient system like in CTP1/2. So I will not buy this game.

-Martin

[Harovan]

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
Maybe it's stupid to you, but that's his opinion. Why don't you let people have thier opinions? Do you feel threatened by them?

Charles.

That's a good one ! Thank God you always let other people their opinion and never flame or insult them, if they say that they like the game.

Btw: I also still enjoy it to play, though I am aware that it has serious flaws.

[Zachriel]

Originally posted by Martin Gühmann
Rejoining

Hey you can't fix the main problems like obsolete and time wasting tile improving sytem or the time wasting building complete popup messages and replace them by a more efficient system like in CTP1/2. So I will not buy this game.

-Martin

Just out of curiousity, how do you apparently "know" so much about Civ3 if you haven't bought the game?

[Harovan]

Originally posted by Martin Gühmann
Hey you can't fix the main problems like obsolete and time wasting tile improving sytem or the time wasting building complete popup messages and replace them by a more efficient system like in CTP1/2.

Do you mean this system, that tells you that a city's queue is empty, after a whole turn production was wasted?

Btw: capturing workers is fun, and yes, I also play CTP2 now and then (though not CTP1 anymore)

[Martin Gühmann]

Originally posted by Zachriel
Just out of curiousity, how do you apparently "know" so much about Civ3 if you haven't bought the game?

Apolyton is the short answer. If you are here than you know that you have to improve your terrain with workers in Civ3. That is one or two steps backwards from CTP1/2. And that was the reason why I only played a demo of SMAC. I know that this system will end with 200 settlers/workers.

And it is easy to guess that they used the civ2 game engine. For example there were these 8bit 255 color graphics you can dowload them from Apolyton there was also someone who uploaded some of the Civ3 units so that we can convert them to CTP1/2. Than terrain and city graphics reminds me two much to Civ2 style, although you can just skip the pixels of the backgrounds that would achieve a reduction of graphics size. That was the way how they did it in CTP1/2. And than reports on a late game tedium even on high end computers sounds familiar from Civ2. Yeah I have to admit that I only saw one picture of an advisor that you lead (probably to a city because one building is complete). BTW empty build queues aren't a real problem in CTP2 just cycle with 'o' through all cities with empty build queues and you shouldn't have the problem. (No need ro open an message.)

I got another hint from an arthicle about Ci3 posted I think on ZDF-net or somewhere else. However I translated this arthicle into German:

The moment Firaxis inked the deal with Hasbro, Meier and his design team started playing Civ III. They replaced the art assets of Alpha Centauri (Firaxis' last big strategy title) with crude Civilization-style placeholders, and modified the rules to reflect their design decisions for this new game.

From this quote you can guess that they used the same game engine as they used in SMAC. And if they did it once why shouldn't do they it twice. From the 8bit 255 color graphics it is more probably that they used the Civ2 game engine. As CTP1 and SMAC were released very close together, and CTP1 has 24 bit 16 Million collor graphics. So it is very probably that they use the Civ2 game engine.

To get to know that Civ3 savegames waste a lot of hard drive just find a thread in the Civ3 forum in that Dan_Magata or what this name is stated that they don't care on harddrive space, because players have available hundret of gigabytes available nowadays.

Weak scenario editor just read the forum.
No slic like language in Civ3 just read one post in the CTP2 forum that made Peter Triggs.
Modding limitations read the posts.

And so I could go on and noone contradics. Oh and by the way I thought the intension of signatures is that people read them.

So my answer to the initial question of this thread is a rebuild of Civ3 from the cratch if you want real the greatest Civ3 that you ever got and will get. But no company has the interest to make such a game otherwise they wouldn't sell another game. Of course if you have the source code you could really turn this game into a great game but that is also true for CTP2. But in comnparision to CTP2 which must only be finished you need for Civ3 more work to get rid of this settler/worker tile improving system. Of course finally I can live with these inferior graphics if the game would offer more than CTP2 in its modded versions. That is also a difference to CTP2. The modding abilities of CTP2 are huge and that is the reason why this game is still alive. Of course there will be people who try to improve the game but there are less modding possibilities in Civ3 than in CTP2.

-Martin

[Death's Toe]

Re: Re: What needs to be done to make this game great.

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley


I think instead of everyone ranting off suggestions and ideas (which is good, don't get me wrong) Firaxis should just make a 'super editor' with the ability to customize everything you guys mentioned and more, that way we don't have to fight or debate over what should or shouldn't be in the game. Makes perfect sense to me, not too many people argued over Civ2 -- but then again we had a complete game with excellent customization tools.

Charles.

I think this 'super-editor' already exists, its called C++. You can make any game you want with it.

[CharlesUFarley]

Originally posted by Sir Ralph




That's a good one ! Thank God you always let other people their opinion and never flame or insult them, if they say that they like the game.

Btw: I also still enjoy it to play, though I am aware that it has serious flaws.

I usually don't "flame" or "insult" someone unless they deny that the game has problems. And most of the time it's because they hijack my posts with insignificant ranting. And I never said I hated Civ3, I'm just severly let down by it's overall design. I'm also glad that you enjoy Civ3, I won't ever try to take that away from you or others in these forums. But it would seem that people are always trying to take away from me -- the criticism that I am entitled too. All in all everyone has valid points and issues, but a more important problem lives on the horizon -- how can we 'improve' this game with the cooperation of Firaxis -- at this point it almost seems like talking to a wall.

Any ideas?

Charles.

[CharlesUFarley]

Re: What needs to be done to make this game great.

Originally posted by Death's Toe
I think this 'super-editor' already exists, its called C++. You can make any game you want with it.

If we we're game designers (that means you too!) we surely wouldn't be in a game discussion forum relating to another companies products. You're just as guilty for being here as we are. So asside from a smartass remark -- do you have a better idea?

Charles.

[Dan Magaha FIRAXIS]

Originally posted by Martin Gühmann
And so I could go on and noone contradics. Oh and by the way I thought the intension of signatures is that people read them.

Well then! Allow me to be the first to contradict, since pretty much everything you said about Civ III was false.

Dan


P.S. my signature may be too much for the common reader to handle; exercise caution. I can't be held responsible if anyone decides to totally flip out and start cutting heads off.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
P.S. my signature may be too much for the common reader to handle; exercise caution. I can't be held responsible if anyone decides to totally flip out and start cutting heads off.

Well Dan, that may be too much to ask. I can sense that some are just on the edge, all they need is a nudge, such as you have provided, and flip... off go the heads.

Good thing this an on-line, not face to face, community.

Salve

BTW, could you get back to slaving away over the code? Sheesh, you think that people wanted to hear from you or something.

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS P.S. my signature may be too much for the common reader to handle; exercise caution. I can't be held responsible if anyone decides to totally flip out and start cutting heads off.

*LOL*

Even worse is if you click "No" when first entering!! Arrgh!!

[Kevin Ar18]

I want a modern eara that is actually fun.

• Submarines that can take out ships.
• Mutually Assured Defense (cold war) with ICBMS, and it's resulting radiation effects.
• Biological weapons (take out population).
• Cruise missles that can actually take out units.
• Units that can intercept cruise missiles (such as what was used in the Gulf War to shoot down cruise missiles being shot at Israel).
• Nuclear Missiles that destroy all units.
• Airplanes that can actually kill things and you can actually move places.
• Airbases
• Give us some city structures that can actually get rid of pollution. Or better yet get rid of the pollution idea altogether or separate radition and regular polution as separate things -- aka regular pollution just decreases health perhaps and radiation must be cleaned up.

Other game concepts.

• Solid borders that are held by diplomacy or war not some stupid culture model.
• Units that can realistically fortify and keep a city from revolting (say 1 infantry unit).
• Some real diplomacy where you can actually make trustworthy alliances and win an victory with your ally.
• Get rid of the unprecedented and uncalled for level of corruption in cities.
• Realism! Realism!! Realism!!! (implemented in an enjoyable way)

Some things I wouldn't mind having

• Use real life pictures for wonders.
• Use pictures or movies of real people and voices.

[Harovan]

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
I usually don't "flame" or "insult" someone unless they deny that the game has problems.

I once posted my opinion, that I enjoy the game knowing that it's not perfect, and that I have faith that the next patch will fix many problems. Your answer was "fanboy", "slap yourself" and worse. See what I'm talking about? The speed you are collecting enemies is amazing.

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
And most of the time it's because they hijack my posts with insignificant ranting.

I see. Complaints are insignificant ranting. Approvals are intelligent and welcome.

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
And I never said I hated Civ3...

I care less what you think about the game, as long as you leave others the right for their own opinion.

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
But it would seem that people are always trying to take away from me -- the criticism that I am entitled too.

May be because others see in your critizism insignificant ranting? I admit, that both sides in this discussion act not very fair.

Originally posted by CharlesUFarley
All in all everyone has valid points and issues, but a more important problem lives on the horizon -- how can we 'improve' this game with the cooperation of Firaxis -- at this point it almost seems like talking to a wall.

I'm content with Firaxis' statement, that they work on a patch. We will see what it brings and what they will be able to improve. I'm sure my 3 main complaints "missing scenario editor", "missing MP mode" and "poor game interface" are at their schedule. So why should I cry everyday "Firaxis, where is the patch?" or "Firaxis, where is your statement what you are doing?" The patch will be right here, when it's ready.

[Martin Gühmann]

Originally posted by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS
Well then! Allow me to be the first to contradict, since pretty much everything you said about Civ III was false.

Dan

So and what is in particular false that I said? So far you did not gave any arguments.

I downloaded some Civ3 graphics from this side:

I found cities and terrain on 8bit 255 colors graphics.

So Civ3 uses 8bit 255 colors graphics.

True or False, Dan?

I checked the size of your unit animations they have a size around 400 to 800 kb. That's one for you as CTP2 uses unit animations of the same size. But they 24bit 16 million color graphics.

About terrain improving: Civ3 uses units (workers) and not PW to develope the city terrain.

True or False, Dan?

I know what happend when you have 200 settlers on your map improving the terrain. It took very long to move all my units. One and a half hour to move all my units in Civ2. And than I had to wait 20 minutes on my 486er that it was finished to cycle through all my 250 cities. Note that was the the time with disabled pop up windows I had to fill the build queue over the city manager manually. My K6 233 needed for the same task 4 minutes but still too much as I got the message that I reached the maximum city limit Civ2 died for me.

So I can ask you do I have to click away a popup window if a city finished a building or unit?

Yes or No, Dan?

Here is a qoute from you from another thread:

Originally posted by Dan Magaha FIRAXIS in Apolyton CS Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-Creation > Utility for placing cities
The size of the savegame has very little connection to the efficiency of the coding. Savegames of many games (not just Civ III) are big because they load faster than if they were compressed

Since most users typically have hundreds of megs (if not gigs) to spare, speed is more of an issue than HD space.

So Firaxis cares on the harddrive space of the games.

True or False, Dan?

I reqoute this again, Dan:

The moment Firaxis inked the deal with Hasbro, Meier and his design team started playing Civ III. They replaced the art assets of Alpha Centauri (Firaxis' last big strategy title) with crude Civilization-style placeholders, and modified the rules to reflect their design decisions for this new game.

From this qoute I can guess:

Civ3 uses the SMAC game engine.

True or False, Dan?

From the graphics thing I can guess.

Civ3 uses the Civ2 game engine.

And here is another qoute from the same article:

The second guiding principle of Civilization III—the fun factor—governs the overall approach of the game. Instead of simply adding and building on top of Civilization II (1996), Firaxis decided to go back to the roots of the original. "We loved the accessibility of that first game. It was so easy to start playing." Meier explains. "Right from the beginning, all this cool stuff started happening."

So this another reason to judge Civ3 as Civ1.8. I don't ask you wheather this is true or false as this depends on opinion.

Another piont Civ3 textfiles are open so that you can add easily new terrain improvements, wonders, governments, units, city buildings, technologies, civs, goods, terrains, concepts, orders, AI strategies, AI personalities like in CTP.

True or False, Dan?

Can you mod Civ3 as you can mod CTP2.

Another statement. Civ3 contains a makro programming language that allows modders to implement new features, like a city capture option that allows the human player to wipe out a just conquered city. I guess this sound familiar. But there is a lot more possible: We saw an unit updater, an prisionars of war mod, wonder units, code that adds refugies to the game militia units just to give you some examples in CTP2. Civ3 contains something like slic.

True or False, Dan?

Actually I have the feeling that you just read the short quote from my post and not the earlier post here.

So you read my post entirely, Dan.

True or False, Dan?

Yes I know it is hard to convince me that Civ3 is a great game. But is very interesting that Firaxis does not own the Civ licence. The part of the article that I quoted above gave me the hint.

So Dan I can ask again: Firaxis owns the Civ licience.

True or False?

From your post you used an all quantor to judge my statements. And that can be easily fasified. Actual you just said that I am wrong, but not where and why of course you know a lot more things about Civ3 better than I. But I expect an explaination, to jugde your statement for a contratiction. So I must conclude that you did not contradict me.

-Martin