I like Civ 3 a lot. Very good game. A lot of great additions to the Civ tradition, especially the resource system. But there's something missing... flavor.
I know, it doesn't add to the thinking of the game, or the strategy, or anything else that makes up the actual "meat" of the game. But I miss the "flavor" that peppered SMAC. The voice-overs, reading quotes from books that have never been written, or books written long ago. The wonder movies. (Good lord, the wonder movies!) Just the general "feel" that the game created through these extra touches. It made SMAC very immersive. That's what Civ3 is lacking. It isn't pulling me in the way SMAC did. It might be slightly less deep strategically, but it's the flavor that makes SMAC the superior game, in my mind.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
I know, it doesn't add to the thinking of the game, or the strategy, or anything else that makes up the actual "meat" of the game. But I miss the "flavor" that peppered SMAC. The voice-overs, reading quotes from books that have never been written, or books written long ago. The wonder movies. (Good lord, the wonder movies!) Just the general "feel" that the game created through these extra touches. It made SMAC very immersive. That's what Civ3 is lacking. It isn't pulling me in the way SMAC did. It might be slightly less deep strategically, but it's the flavor that makes SMAC the superior game, in my mind.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
Comment