1. Colonies are useful, but vulnerable. So protect them!
2. My cavalry loose a lot against rifleman, so there I also don't agree.
3. Phalanx beating tank is true, but that was a design decision, not a flaw. They did that on purpose, to make it more difficult for even advanced tech civs to blitzkrieg.
4. Bombarding isn't useless, it's just not as effective as in civ2. If you want to use them properly, you bombard and then finish them off with ground troops, like in real life.
5. Corruption is a problem for a large civ, but this is also a design decision, no flaw. Just to make it harder to maintain a large property.
6. The government Fundamentalism in civ2 was very unrealistic, so that is corrected.
And I can continue like this but I don't think it's any use. You made up your mind, you think civ3 stinks. That is your right, but I simply disagree. Sure, civ3 is much more difficult than civ2, but some people quit and others face the difficulties and try even harder....
2. My cavalry loose a lot against rifleman, so there I also don't agree.
3. Phalanx beating tank is true, but that was a design decision, not a flaw. They did that on purpose, to make it more difficult for even advanced tech civs to blitzkrieg.
4. Bombarding isn't useless, it's just not as effective as in civ2. If you want to use them properly, you bombard and then finish them off with ground troops, like in real life.
5. Corruption is a problem for a large civ, but this is also a design decision, no flaw. Just to make it harder to maintain a large property.
6. The government Fundamentalism in civ2 was very unrealistic, so that is corrected.
And I can continue like this but I don't think it's any use. You made up your mind, you think civ3 stinks. That is your right, but I simply disagree. Sure, civ3 is much more difficult than civ2, but some people quit and others face the difficulties and try even harder....
Comment