Some research on Civ3

[SlightlyMadman]

a
a
c

[Kinnie]

1.a
2.d
3.b

[GePap]

BAD

1.b
Got it as soon as it came out but had a dry spell between 98-99.
2.a
I like building huge empires through internal growth, not conquest. I also found some of the military management boring, specially early on (2000 years to cross asia? A bit much)
3.d
No scenerios ! Various other problems

Hey, look, it spells BAD, how interesting

[August Borms]

b
e
d

[moi]

abd

[Sze]

a - though I only played for a few months before giving up on it, I hated the way the AI responded in the end game
b
d

[cassembler]

b
c
b

[Screwball54]

1. A
2. A
3. C

[gachnar]

B Cubed

B
B
B

[EnochF]

A
B
D

[Alex]

1. B
2. B
3. B

No, Civ3 is not perfect, but I like it.

Old civ formula, that may be the problem, but I intend to discuss this later...

[RichM]

1) a
2) c
3) d

I think that civ3 improves some of the gameplay, but greatly lacks atmosphere. It's a little too much like work rather than conquering the world.

[gremalkin]

1) a
2) d
3) c

Gotta do something about the end-game..

[Steve Clark]

1. b - 3 years this month

2. none of the above - goal is usually to achieve a Major Victory in the scenario's objectives

3. none of the above - ask me when we start playing Civ3 scenarios

[DilithiumDad]

1. e --I believe I am the first to answer this way. Was playing Deadlock and Deadlock2 while you guys were playing Civ, then I went to Starcraft and SMAC/X.
2. Not applicable! I guess Alpha Centari because of SMAC playing!
3. b --Only significant problem is late game and that long stretch in the Industrial Era before Tanks where you research techs that have no impact.