I've been playing civ III for a while now and reading this forum.
My conclusion is that Civ III is buggy, but still most enjoyable.
After a while though the bugs stand in the way of further play.
Could this all be down to the fact that Civ III was unfinished when released? More time to think things through, implement concepts better and testing would have made Civ III a brilliant game?
If that is the case, it is my opinion that Infogrames take a running jump and that Firaxis and the Civ-III-fan-community (those that can program), collaborate to make Civ III what it should have been (Under the coordination of Firaxis). If you look at the contribution the Fans made to Baldur's Gate II in cooperation and with support from Blackisle, this is certainly possible.
If Firaxis doesn't have the time/manpower the fan-community certainly does.
Robert
My conclusion is that Civ III is buggy, but still most enjoyable.
After a while though the bugs stand in the way of further play.
Could this all be down to the fact that Civ III was unfinished when released? More time to think things through, implement concepts better and testing would have made Civ III a brilliant game?
If that is the case, it is my opinion that Infogrames take a running jump and that Firaxis and the Civ-III-fan-community (those that can program), collaborate to make Civ III what it should have been (Under the coordination of Firaxis). If you look at the contribution the Fans made to Baldur's Gate II in cooperation and with support from Blackisle, this is certainly possible.
If Firaxis doesn't have the time/manpower the fan-community certainly does.
Robert
Comment