Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Future Era

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Future Era

    One of the things I think would have or could have been improved on CIV2 that would have made more of an impact for CIV3 would be to have added a whole new future era. New techs could have been put in, new improvements, new wonders, new units etc. Oh wel, maybe CIV4

  • #2
    they did this with TOT and CTP....it starts getting a little futuristic.... and all the sudden you have robots and such....were not at that era just yet in real life so its silly to put it in a civ game...

    but new techs and improvements would be kewl
    Boston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Future Era

      Originally posted by The Rook
      One of the things I think would have or could have been improved on CIV2 that would have made more of an impact for CIV3 would be to have added a whole new future era. New techs could have been put in, new improvements, new wonders, new units etc. Oh wel, maybe CIV4
      Perhaps you would like to have a game of SMAC??

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't think it's "silly" just because we have not reached that age yet. I just like the opportunity to take a Civ from the stone age to the present, and beyond.


        I never played SMAC, for some reason, it just never appealed to me. I prefer to have a single fluid game.

        Comment


        • #5
          I really liked that era in CTP games but I am not sure if it is very good conserning playbility.....
          One Life One Game...

          Comment


          • #6
            ToT wasnt too bad.

            I did Like the two different simultaneous maps though, even if they where pointless.
            Im sorry Mr Civ Franchise, Civ3 was DOA

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tilemacho
              I really liked that era in CTP games but I am not sure if it is very good conserning playbility.....
              Telemachus, I liked that era too and I just can't think why it wouldn't be good conserning playability. I mean mechas and such, it would have been great to see firaxis vision of things to come..
              Que l’Univers n’est qu’un défaut dans la pureté de Non-être.

              - Paul Valery

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The Rook
                I don't think it's "silly" just because we have not reached that age yet. I just like the opportunity to take a Civ from the stone age to the present, and beyond.


                I never played SMAC, for some reason, it just never appealed to me. I prefer to have a single fluid game.
                You should try to overlook the setting and play it anyhow. SMAC is a really good game, much more complex and interesting than Civ III in a lot of ways...

                Comment

                Working...
                X