NATO and Socialism - You people really need to start looking at these things from the other side.
First off, France was invited to join NATO but refused to enter discussions because of the percieved American dominance and their insistance on an independant nuclear force.
Lets be perfectly honest, NATO eventually degenerated into additional airfields for the US to launch bombers from and additional markets for US arms companies to sell to, you can't help but agreeing with the French on why they cynically looked at NATO as "America Inc". At least France had to balls to stand up for their beliefs, something I would have thought Americans would have appreciated.
You may deride France's insistance that US attacks on other countries are nothing to do with NATO and their reluctance to become involved, but that same derision never emerged when Britain (another NATO member) engaged Argentina over the Falklands conflict, that was "nothing to do with America" and that was okay ?
Socialism is often regarded as one step down from Communism, there are socialist organisations everywhere in Europe and I can tell you categorically that none of them would consider Communism to be a viable form of government, in Europe we had Communist countries of the worst kind right next door to us for 50 years, thats enough to put you off forever. In fact I'd lay a bet that there are more diehard Communists in American than in Europe !
What Europe refers to as "socialism" is merely a variation on American liberal politics (or rather the other way round), and I'm not talking about the "bleeding-heart" liberal kind. The politics of socialism have as much central control as any other form of government, just a different approach.
First off, France was invited to join NATO but refused to enter discussions because of the percieved American dominance and their insistance on an independant nuclear force.
Lets be perfectly honest, NATO eventually degenerated into additional airfields for the US to launch bombers from and additional markets for US arms companies to sell to, you can't help but agreeing with the French on why they cynically looked at NATO as "America Inc". At least France had to balls to stand up for their beliefs, something I would have thought Americans would have appreciated.
You may deride France's insistance that US attacks on other countries are nothing to do with NATO and their reluctance to become involved, but that same derision never emerged when Britain (another NATO member) engaged Argentina over the Falklands conflict, that was "nothing to do with America" and that was okay ?
Socialism is often regarded as one step down from Communism, there are socialist organisations everywhere in Europe and I can tell you categorically that none of them would consider Communism to be a viable form of government, in Europe we had Communist countries of the worst kind right next door to us for 50 years, thats enough to put you off forever. In fact I'd lay a bet that there are more diehard Communists in American than in Europe !
What Europe refers to as "socialism" is merely a variation on American liberal politics (or rather the other way round), and I'm not talking about the "bleeding-heart" liberal kind. The politics of socialism have as much central control as any other form of government, just a different approach.
Comment